Literature DB >> 20922713

Proposal for a modified grading system based on mitotic index and Bcl2 provides objective determination of clinical outcome for patients with breast cancer.

Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah1, Desmond G Powe, Graham Ball, Maria A Lopez-Garcia, Hany O Habashy, Andrew R Green, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that the interaction between mitotic index (M) and Bcl2 could accurately discriminate between low- and high-grade breast cancer (BC) and provide a more objective measure of clinical outcome than histological grade, especially for patients with intermediate histological grade (G2), small size or oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative cancers. A well-characterized series of 1650 BCs with long-term follow-up was subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for Bcl2. Mitotic index (M) was assessed according to Nottingham Grading System (NGS) guidelines: M1: < 10 mitoses; M2: 10-18 mitoses; M3: > 18 mitoses. Results were validated in an independent series of patients (n = 245) uniformly treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, BCs were classified according to the combined M/Bcl2 profile and compared with NGS. Multivariate Cox regression models using validated prognostic factors demonstrated that the subgroups defined by M/Bcl2 profile remained significantly associated with patients' outcome but also performed better than lymph node status and tumour size. Incorporation of the M/Bcl2 profile into the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) reclassified twice as many patients into the excellent prognosis group, potentially improving decision-making and sparing patients unneeded systemic adjuvant therapy. Patients with M2-3/Bcl2- and M3/Bcl2+ (high risk) had a two- to three-fold increased risk of recurrence when treated with either adjuvant hormone therapy or anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with those with M1/Bcl2 ± and M2/Bcl2+ (low risk) [HR = 3.4 (2.8-5.6); p < 0.0001 and HR = 2.3 (1.2-4.3); p = 0.0009]. In conclusion, a grading system defined by mitotic counting and Bcl2 expression accurately reclassified patients with NGS-G2, small tumour size or ER-negative cancers into two groups: low risk (NGS-G1-like) versus high risk (NGS-G3-like) of BC mortality and recurrence, improving prognosis and therapeutic planning.
Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20922713     DOI: 10.1002/path.2775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  17 in total

1.  Immunohistochemistry profiles of breast ductal carcinoma: factor analysis of digital image analysis data.

Authors:  Arvydas Laurinavicius; Aida Laurinaviciene; Valerijus Ostapenko; Darius Dasevicius; Sonata Jarmalaite; Juozas Lazutka
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 2.  Targeting BCL-2 to enhance vulnerability to therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Merino; S W Lok; J E Visvader; G J Lindeman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  [Histological grading of breast cancer].

Authors:  M Christgen; F Länger; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Does the expression of BCL2 have prognostic significance in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma?

Authors:  Krishna Pillai; Mohammad H Pourgholami; Terence C Chua; David L Morris
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer molecular signatures and therapeutic potentials (Review).

Authors:  Mei Hong Zhang; Hong Tao Man; Xiao Dan Zhao; Ni Dong; Shi Liang Ma
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2013-10-25

6.  Ki67-BCL2 index in prognosis of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Krishna Pillai; Mohammad H Pourgholami; Terence C Chua; David L Morris
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Duprez; Paul M Wilkerson; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Maryou B Lambros; Alan MacKay; Roger A'Hern; Arnaud Gauthier; Vidya Pawar; Pierre-Emanuel Colombo; Frances Daley; Rachael Natrajan; Eric Ward; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Flavie Arbion; Patrick Michenet; Britta Weigelt; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Neven; Giuseppe Floris; Laurence Slembrouck; Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Hans Wildiers; Ann Smeets; Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy; Chantal Van Ongeval; Lynn Jongen; Caroline Weltens; Kevin Punie; Griet Hoste; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen; Sileny Han; Ines Nevelsteen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Aurora kinase A outperforms Ki67 as a prognostic marker in ER-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  H R Ali; S-J Dawson; F M Blows; E Provenzano; P D Pharoah; C Caldas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic value of mitotic index and Bcl2 expression in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Miangela M Lacle; Carmen van der Pol; Arjen Witkamp; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.