OBJECTIVES: The need for recognition of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in primary care is increasingly discussed because MCI is a risk factor for dementia. General Practitioners (GPs) could play an important role in the detection of MCI since they have regular and long-term contact with the majority of the elderly population. Thus the objective of this study is to find out how well GPs recognize persons with MCI in their practice population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care chart registry sample. PARTICIPANTS: 3,242 non-demented GP patients aged 75-89 years. MEASUREMENTS: GPs assessed the cognitive status of their patients on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Thereafter, trained interviewers collected psychometric data by interviewing the patients at home. The interview data constitute the basis for the definition of MCI cases (gold standard). RESULTS: The sensitivity of GPs to detect MCI was very low (11-12%) whereas their specificity amounts to 93-94%. Patients with MCI with a middle or high level of education more often got a false negative assignment than patients with a low educational level. The risk of a false positive assignment rose with the patients' degree of comorbidity. GPs were better at detecting MCI when memory or two and more MCI-domains were impaired. CONCLUSION: The results show that GPs recognise MCI in a very limited number of cases when based on clinical impression only. A further development of the MCI concept and its operationalisation is necessary. Emphasis should be placed on validated, reliable and standardised tests for routine use in primary care encompassing other than only cognitive domains and on case finding approaches rather than on screening. Then a better attention and qualification of GPs with regard to the recognition of MCI might be achievable.
OBJECTIVES: The need for recognition of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in primary care is increasingly discussed because MCI is a risk factor for dementia. General Practitioners (GPs) could play an important role in the detection of MCI since they have regular and long-term contact with the majority of the elderly population. Thus the objective of this study is to find out how well GPs recognize persons with MCI in their practice population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care chart registry sample. PARTICIPANTS: 3,242 non-demented GP patients aged 75-89 years. MEASUREMENTS: GPs assessed the cognitive status of their patients on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Thereafter, trained interviewers collected psychometric data by interviewing the patients at home. The interview data constitute the basis for the definition of MCI cases (gold standard). RESULTS: The sensitivity of GPs to detect MCI was very low (11-12%) whereas their specificity amounts to 93-94%. Patients with MCI with a middle or high level of education more often got a false negative assignment than patients with a low educational level. The risk of a false positive assignment rose with the patients' degree of comorbidity. GPs were better at detecting MCI when memory or two and more MCI-domains were impaired. CONCLUSION: The results show that GPs recognise MCI in a very limited number of cases when based on clinical impression only. A further development of the MCI concept and its operationalisation is necessary. Emphasis should be placed on validated, reliable and standardised tests for routine use in primary care encompassing other than only cognitive domains and on case finding approaches rather than on screening. Then a better attention and qualification of GPs with regard to the recognition of MCI might be achievable.
Authors: Francesco Panza; Alessia D'Introno; Anna Maria Colacicco; Cristiano Capurso; Angelo Del Parigi; Richard J Caselli; Alberto Pilotto; Giovanni Argentieri; Pier Luigi Scapicchio; Emanuele Scafato; Antonio Capurso; Vincenzo Solfrizzi Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Samuel T Creavin; Anna H Noel-Storr; Ryan J Langdon; Edo Richard; Alexandra L Creavin; Sarah Cullum; Sarah Purdy; Yoav Ben-Shlomo Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Jolien Janssen; Paula S Koekkoek; Geert Jan Biessels; L Jaap Kappelle; Guy E H M Rutten Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 3.320