Literature DB >> 20921233

Young proteins experience more variable selection pressures than old proteins.

Anchal Vishnoi1, Sergey Kryazhimskiy, Georgii A Bazykin, Sridhar Hannenhalli, Joshua B Plotkin.   

Abstract

It is well known that young proteins tend to experience weaker purifying selection and evolve more quickly than old proteins. Here, we show that, in addition, young proteins tend to experience more variable selection pressures over time than old proteins. We demonstrate this pattern in three independent taxonomic groups: yeast, Drosophila, and mammals. The increased variability of selection pressures on young proteins is highly significant even after controlling for the fact that young proteins are typically shorter and experience weaker purifying selection than old proteins. The majority of our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the function of a young gene tends to change over time more readily than that of an old gene. At the same time, our results may be caused in part by young genes that serve constant functions over time, but nevertheless appear to evolve under changing selection pressures due to depletion of adaptive mutations. In either case, our results imply that the evolution of a protein-coding sequence is partly determined by its age and origin, and not only by the phenotypic properties of the encoded protein. We discuss, via specific examples, the consequences of these findings for understanding of the sources of evolutionary novelty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921233      PMCID: PMC2963820          DOI: 10.1101/gr.109595.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  48 in total

1.  Gene evolution and the haemoglobins.

Authors:  V M INGRAM
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1961-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Assessing the determinants of evolutionary rates in the presence of noise.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Novel genes derived from noncoding DNA in Drosophila melanogaster are frequently X-linked and exhibit testis-biased expression.

Authors:  Mia T Levine; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Heather A Lindfors; David J Begun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution.

Authors:  D Allan Drummond; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The population genetics of dN/dS.

Authors:  Sergey Kryazhimskiy; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  De novo origination of a new protein-coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Ruoping Zhao; Huifeng Jiang; Wen Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Natural selection for nucleotide usage at synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in influenza A virus genes.

Authors:  Sergey Kryazhimskiy; Georgii A Bazykin; Jonathan Dushoff
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Rate of evolution in brain-expressed genes in humans and other primates.

Authors:  Hurng-Yi Wang; Huan-Chieh Chien; Naoki Osada; Katsuyuki Hashimoto; Sumio Sugano; Takashi Gojobori; Chen-Kung Chou; Shih-Feng Tsai; Chung-I Wu; C-K James Shen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  On homology searches by protein Blast and the characterization of the age of genes.

Authors:  M Mar Albà; Jose Castresana
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The emergence and fate of horizontally acquired genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Mark W J van Passel; Pradeep Reddy Marri; Howard Ochman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  35 in total

1.  Expression Differentiation Is Constrained to Low-Expression Proteins over Ecological Timescales.

Authors:  Mark J Margres; Kenneth P Wray; Margaret Seavy; James J McGivern; Nathanael D Herrera; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic and epigenetic regulation of human lincRNA gene expression.

Authors:  Konstantin Popadin; Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  The evolutionary origin of orphan genes.

Authors:  Diethard Tautz; Tomislav Domazet-Lošo
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Old and young duplicate genes reveal different responses to environmental changes in Arachis duranensis.

Authors:  Hui Song; Juan Sun; Guofeng Yang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Genome-wide survey of natural selection on functional, structural, and network properties of polymorphic sites in Saccharomyces paradoxus.

Authors:  Anchal Vishnoi; Praveen Sethupathy; Daniel Simola; Joshua B Plotkin; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  3'untranslated regions of tumor suppressor genes evolved specific features to favor cancer resistance.

Authors:  Dan Huang; Xiansong Wang; Ziheng Huang; Yingzhi Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Tony Gin; Sunny Hei Wong; Jun Yu; Lin Zhang; Matthew Tak Vai Chan; Huarong Chen; William Ka Kei Wu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  How old is my gene?

Authors:  John A Capra; Maureen Stolzer; Dannie Durand; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Gene age predicts the strength of purifying selection acting on gene expression variation in humans.

Authors:  Konstantin Y Popadin; Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus; Tuuli Lappalainen; Alfonso Buil; Julia Steinberg; Sergey I Nikolaev; Samuel W Lukowski; Georgii A Bazykin; Vladimir B Seplyarskiy; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of lineage-specific genes within zebrafish.

Authors:  Liandong Yang; Ming Zou; Beide Fu; Shunping He
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  H2A.Z nucleosome positioning has no impact on genetic variation in Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Yitao Tang; Shan Dong; Xinkai Cao; Qing Zhou; Guitao Ding; Cizhong Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.