Literature DB >> 2090436

Gametic imprinting in maize in relation to the angiosperm life cycle.

J L Kermicle1, M Alleman.   

Abstract

Differences in the activity of maternally and paternally derived genomes in maize endosperm have been observed at three levels of genetic manipulation. When the balance of entire chromosome sets departs from the standard ratio of two of maternal origin to one of paternal origin, development is impaired, often leading to seed failure. At the level of individual chromosomes, absence of a paternal representative for 8 of the 19 chromosome arms tested causes a marked reduction in kernel size. Replacement of the missing arms by ones of maternal origin does not complement this defect. At the gene level, some alleles of R confer solid coloration on the aleurone layer when transmitted maternally but patchy coloration (mottled) when transmitted via pollen. In contrast with the endosperm, no effect of parentage on R phenotype has been detected in embryonic and seedling tissues. Furthermore, gynogenetic and androgenetic haploid plants are viable in maize and are similar in appearance. The detection of parental effects in the endosperm, but not the embryo, points to the few cell divisions of the gametophytes as a critical stage in imprinting. Chromosomally based epigenetic variation originating at this stage would be reflected as imprinting effects. A separate fertilization establishes a line of genetic descent in the embryo that appears to be relatively free of imprinted genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2090436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Suppl


  32 in total

1.  Hypomethylation promotes autonomous endosperm development and rescues postfertilization lethality in fie mutants.

Authors:  R Vinkenoog; M Spielman; S Adams; R L Fischer; H G Dickinson; R J Scott
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Developmental patterns of chromatin structure and DNA methylation responsible for epigenetic expression of a maize regulatory gene.

Authors:  O A Hoekenga; M G Muszynski; K C Cone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Genomic imprinting and position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  V K Lloyd; D A Sinclair; T A Grigliatti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Genomic imprinting and endosperm development in flowering plants.

Authors:  Rinke Vinkenoog; Catherine Bushell; Melissa Spielman; Sally Adams; Hugh G Dickinson; Rod J Scott
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Mechanisms of Plant Reproduction: Questions and Approaches.

Authors:  R. Chasan; V. Walbot
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Arabidopsis haiku mutants reveal new controls of seed size by endosperm.

Authors:  Damien Garcia; Virginie Saingery; Pierre Chambrier; Ulrike Mayer; Gerd Jürgens; Frédéric Berger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Multiple trans-sensing interactions affect meiotically heritable epigenetic states at the maize pl1 locus.

Authors:  Stephen M Gross; Jay B Hollick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comprehensive analysis of imprinted genes in maize reveals allelic variation for imprinting and limited conservation with other species.

Authors:  Amanda J Waters; Paul Bilinski; Steven R Eichten; Matthew W Vaughn; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Mary Gehring; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.