INTRODUCTION: Undertreatment of osteoporosis is common, even for high-risk patients. Among the reasons for undertreatment may be a clinician's perception of a lack of treatment benefit, particularly in light of patients' expected future mortality. Among US Medicare beneficiaries, we evaluated the risk for second fracture versus death in the 5 years following a hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture. METHODS: Using data from 1999 to 2006 for a random 5% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries, we identified individuals who experienced an incident hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture in 2000 or 2001. We evaluated the risk for a second incident fracture versus death in the following 5 years. Results were stratified by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities. In light of the competing mortality risk, and assuming 30% efficacy of an osteoporosis medication to prevent a second fracture, we calculated the number of individuals needed to treat (NNT) for 5 years after first fracture to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture. RESULTS: We identified 18,853, 12,751, and 7635 persons with an incident hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture, respectively. Although the 5-year risk of death usually exceeded the risk for second fracture across age, gender, racial groups, and primary fracture type (median ratio of death to second fracture=1.4, interquartile range 0.9, 2.0), the 5-year risk for second fracture was high, varying from a low of 13% to a high of 43%. Across demographic groups, the NNT to prevent a second fracture was low, ranging from 8 to 46. CONCLUSION: Among older persons with hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture, although the risk for death was usually greater than the risk for a second fracture, both were high. The relatively low NNT to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture fell within a range generally considered acceptable for secondary prevention strategies.
INTRODUCTION: Undertreatment of osteoporosis is common, even for high-risk patients. Among the reasons for undertreatment may be a clinician's perception of a lack of treatment benefit, particularly in light of patients' expected future mortality. Among US Medicare beneficiaries, we evaluated the risk for second fracture versus death in the 5 years following a hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture. METHODS: Using data from 1999 to 2006 for a random 5% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries, we identified individuals who experienced an incident hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture in 2000 or 2001. We evaluated the risk for a second incident fracture versus death in the following 5 years. Results were stratified by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical comorbidities. In light of the competing mortality risk, and assuming 30% efficacy of an osteoporosis medication to prevent a second fracture, we calculated the number of individuals needed to treat (NNT) for 5 years after first fracture to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture. RESULTS: We identified 18,853, 12,751, and 7635 persons with an incident hip, clinical vertebral, and wrist/forearm fracture, respectively. Although the 5-year risk of death usually exceeded the risk for second fracture across age, gender, racial groups, and primary fracture type (median ratio of death to second fracture=1.4, interquartile range 0.9, 2.0), the 5-year risk for second fracture was high, varying from a low of 13% to a high of 43%. Across demographic groups, the NNT to prevent a second fracture was low, ranging from 8 to 46. CONCLUSION: Among older persons with hip, clinical vertebral, or wrist/forearm fracture, although the risk for death was usually greater than the risk for a second fracture, both were high. The relatively low NNT to prevent 1 additional subsequent fracture fell within a range generally considered acceptable for secondary prevention strategies.
Authors: D M Black; D E Thompson; D C Bauer; K Ensrud; T Musliner; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; S Suryawanshi; S R Cummings Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: R M Neer; C D Arnaud; J R Zanchetta; R Prince; G A Gaich; J Y Reginster; A B Hodsman; E F Eriksen; S Ish-Shalom; H K Genant; O Wang; B H Mitlak Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amy S Mudano; Linda Casebeer; Fausto Patino; Jeroan J Allison; Norman W Weissman; Catarina I Kiefe; Sharina Person; Donna Gilbert; Kenneth G Saag Journal: South Med J Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: W Cockerill; M Lunt; A J Silman; C Cooper; P Lips; A K Bhalla; J B Cannata; R Eastell; D Felsenberg; C Gennari; O Johnell; J A Kanis; C Kiss; P Masaryk; M Naves; G Poor; H Raspe; D M Reid; J Reeve; J Stepan; C Todd; A D Woolf; T W O'Neill Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ryan C Outman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Julie L Locher; Jeroan J Allison; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-10-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Kathleen M Hovey; Jane A Cauley; Christopher A Andrews; Jeffrey R Curtis; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nicole C Wright; Wenjun Li; Meryl S LeBoff Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Huifeng Yun; Elizabeth Delzell; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; Paul Muntner; Robert Matthews; Lingli Guo; Nicole Wright; Wilson Smith; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Christopher M O'Connor; Kenneth W Lyles; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: M L Kilgore; R Outman; J L Locher; J J Allison; A Mudano; B Kitchin; K G Saag; J R Curtis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Gabriel S Tajeu; Elizabeth Delzell; Wilson Smith; Tarun Arora; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag; Michael A Morrisey; Huifeng Yun; Meredith L Kilgore Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Samuel Hawley; Jose Leal; Antonella Delmestri; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Nigel K Arden; Cyrus Cooper; M Kassim Javaid; Andrew Judge Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 6.741