Literature DB >> 14618303

Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture.

W Cockerill1, M Lunt, A J Silman, C Cooper, P Lips, A K Bhalla, J B Cannata, R Eastell, D Felsenberg, C Gennari, O Johnell, J A Kanis, C Kiss, P Masaryk, M Naves, G Poor, H Raspe, D M Reid, J Reeve, J Stepan, C Todd, A D Woolf, T W O'Neill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability; however, relatively little is known about the impact of radiographic vertebral fractures on quality of life in population samples. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a recent radiographic vertebral fracture on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
METHODS: Men and women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 12 European centers. Subjects completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and had lateral spine radiographs performed. Subjects in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spinal radiographs performed a mean of 3.8 years later. Prevalent deformities were defined using established morphometric criteria, and incident vertebral fractures by both morphometric criteria and qualitative assessment. For each incident fracture case, three controls matched for age, gender, and center were selected: one with a prevalent deformity (at baseline) and two without prevalent deformities. All subjects were interviewed or completed a postal questionnaire instrument which included Short Form 12 (SF-12), the EQ-5D (former EuroQol), and the quality of life questionnaire of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (QUALEFFO). The median time from the second spinal radiograph until the quality of life survey was 1.9 years. Comparison between cases and their matched controls was undertaken using the signed rank test.
RESULTS: 73 subjects with incident vertebral fracture (cases), mean age 64.8 years (of whom 23 had a baseline deformity), and 196 controls, mean age 63.9 years (of whom 60 had a baseline deformity), were studied. There were strong correlations between the domain scores for each of the three instruments. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the domain scores between cases and those controls with a prevalent deformity. However, compared with the controls without a prevalent deformity the cases had significantly impaired quality of life as determined using the total QUALEFFO score (38.2 vs 33.7), the physical component score of the SF-12 (39.9 vs 43.7) and the health status score of the EQ-5D (62.3 vs 69.9). When the analysis was repeated after stratification of the cases by baseline deformity status (i.e., cases with and without a prevalent deformity at baseline), cases with a prevalent deformity had impaired quality of life compared with their matched controls, both with and without a prevalent deformity. In contrast there was no significant difference in quality of life among the cases without a prevalent deformity and either control group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study a recent vertebral fracture was associated with impairment in quality of life, though this was mainly among those who had sustained a previous vertebral deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618303     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1547-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

1.  Postal administration compared with nurse-supported administration of the QUALEFFO-41 in a population sample: comparison of results and assessment of psychometric properties.

Authors:  P Murrell; C J Todd; A Martin; J Walton; P Lips; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  S E Hall; R A Criddle; T L Comito; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lips; C Cooper; D Agnusdei; F Caulin; P Egger; O Johnell; J A Kanis; S Kellingray; A Leplege; U A Liberman; E McCloskey; H Minne; J Reeve; J Y Reginster; M Scholz; C Todd; M C de Vernejoul; I Wiklund
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Defining incident vertebral deformities in population studies: a comparison of morphometric criteria.

Authors:  M Lunt; A A Ismail; D Felsenberg; C Cooper; J A Kanis; J Reeve; A J Silman; T W O'Neill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Health impact associated with vertebral deformities: results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS).

Authors:  C Matthis; U Weber; T W O'Neill; H Raspe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men.

Authors:  A C Scane; A M Sutcliffe; R M Francis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  Health related quality of life outcome instruments.

Authors:  Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Spain: analysis of the national hospital discharge registry.

Authors:  C Bouza; T López; M Palma; J M Amate
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Health state utility values and patient-reported outcomes before and after vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in an osteoporosis clinical trial.

Authors:  T Imai; S Tanaka; K Kawakami; T Miyazaki; H Hagino; M Shiraki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A clinical tool to determine the necessity of spine radiography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis presenting with back pain.

Authors:  C Roux; G Priol; J Fechtenbaum; B Cortet; S Liu-Léage; M Audran
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Results, experience and technical points learnt with use of the SKy Bone Expander kyphoplasty system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study of 40 patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Leon Siang Shen Foo; William Yeo; Stephanie Fook; Chang Ming Guo; John Li Tat Chen; Wai Mun Yue; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney C Kennedy; George Ioannidis; Jacques P Brown; Anjali Pathak; David A Hanley; Robert G Josse; Rolf J Sebaldt; Wojciech P Olszynski; Alan Tenenhouse; Timothy M Murray; Annie Petrie; Charles H Goldsmith; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Impact of vertebral deformities, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases on quality of life: a population-based study.

Authors:  N M van Schoor; J H Smit; J W R Twisk; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Cross-geographic region differences in quality of life in women with and without vertebral fracture.

Authors:  N M van Schoor; H Yu; J Bobula; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.