Literature DB >> 20889046

Effect of mechanical properties of fillers on the grindability of composite resin adhesives.

Masahiro Iijima1, Takeshi Muguruma2, William A Brantley3, Toshihiro Yuasa2, Jun Uechi2, Itaru Mizoguchi4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of filler properties on the grindability of composite resin adhesives.
METHODS: Six composite resin products were selected: Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), Transbond Plus (3M Unitek), Enlight (Ormco, Glendora, Calif), Kurasper F (Kuraray Medical, Tokyo, Japan), Beauty Ortho Bond (Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), and Beauty Ortho Bond Salivatect (Shofu). Compositions and weight fractions of fillers were determined by x-ray fluorescence analysis and ash test, respectively. The polished surface of each resin specimen was examined with a scanning electron microscope. Vickers hardness of plate specimens (15 × 10 × 3 mm) was measured, and nano-indentation was performed on large filler particles (>10 μm). Grindability for a low-speed tungsten-carbide bur was estimated. Data were compared with anlaysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey multiple range test. Relationships among grindability, filler content, filler nano-indentation hardness (nano-hardness), filler elastic modulus, and Vickers hardness of the composite resins were investigated with the Pearson correlation coefficient test.
RESULTS: Morphology and filler size of these adhesives showed great variations. The products could be divided into 2 groups, based on composition, which affected grindability. Vickers hardness of the adhesives did not correlate (r = 0.140) with filler nano-hardness, which showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.664) with grindability.
CONCLUSIONS: Filler nano-hardness greatly influences the grindability of composite resin adhesives.
Copyright © 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20889046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  In vitro antibacterial and remineralizing effect of adhesive containing triazine and niobium pentoxide phosphate inverted glass.

Authors:  Aline Segatto Pires Altmann; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune; Rodrigo Alex Arthur; Antonio Shigueaki Takimi; Susana Maria Werner Samuel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effects of bonding materials on the mechanical properties of enamel around orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Naohisa Kohda; Masahiro Iijima; William Brantley; Takeshi Muguruma; Toshihiro Yuasa; Susumu Nakagaki; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Force and amount of resin composite paste used in direct and indirect bonding.

Authors:  Takeshi Muguruma; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Masahiro Iijima; Naohisa Kohda; Itaru Mizoguchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effects of fluoride release from orthodontic bonding materials on nanomechanical properties of the enamel around orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Raji; Hamed Banimostafaee; Fatemeh Hajizadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

5.  Acid Neutralizing Ability and Shear Bond Strength Using Orthodontic Adhesives Containing Three Different Types of Bioactive Glass.

Authors:  Song-Yi Yang; Seong-Hwan Kim; Se-Young Choi; Kwang-Mahn Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.