Literature DB >> 20888703

Preoperative chemoradiation with cetuximab, irinotecan, and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: a multicenter Phase II study.

Sun Young Kim1, Yong Sang Hong, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Won Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Seok Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Tak Yun, Seung-Yong Jeong, Hyo Seong Choi, Seok-Byung Lim, Hee Jin Chang, Kyung Hae Jung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoradiation with cetuximab, irinotecan, and capecitabine in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, and mid- to lower rectal cancer were enrolled. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of an initial dose of cetuximab of 400 mg/m(2) 1 week before radiotherapy, and then cetuximab 250 mg/m(2)/week, irinotecan 40 mg/m(2)/week for 5 consecutive weeks and capecitabine 1,650 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days a week (weekdays only) from the first day during radiotherapy. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. The pathologic responses and survival outcomes were evaluated as study endpoints, and an additional KRAS mutation analysis was performed.
RESULTS: In total, 39 patients completed their planned preoperative chemoradiation and underwent R0 resection. The pathologic complete response rate was 23.1% (9/39), and 3 patients (7.7%) showed near total regression of tumor. The 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 80.0% and 94.7%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leukopenia (4, 10.3%), neutropenia (2, 5.1%), anemia (1, 2.6%), diarrhea (2, 5.1%), fatigue (1, 2.6%), skin rash (1, 2.6%), and ileus (1, 2.6%). KRAS mutations were found in 5 (13.2%) of 38 patients who had available tissue for testing. Clinical outcomes were not significantly correlated with KRAS mutation status.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiation with cetuximab, irinotecan, and capecitabine was active and well tolerated. KRAS mutation status was not a predictive factor for pathologic response in this study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888703     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Rob Glynne-Jones; Maher Hadaki; Mark Harrison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

2.  Prospective phase II trial of nimotuzumab in combination with radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ting Jin; Yuan Zhu; Jia-Lin Luo; Ning Zhou; De-Chuan Li; Hai-Xin Ju; Yong-Tian Fan; Yong Liu; Yu-Ping Zhu; Hai-Yang Feng; Lu-Ying Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Surgical outcomes of post chemoradiotherapy unresectable locally advanced rectal cancers improve with interim chemotherapy, is FOLFIRINOX better than CAPOX?

Authors:  Vikas Ostwal; Reena Engineer; Anant Ramaswamy; Arvind Sahu; Saurabh Zanwar; Suprita Arya; Supriya Chopra; Munita Bal; Prachi Patil; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

4.  Phase II Study of Preoperative Treatment with External Radiotherapy Plus Panitumumab in Low-Risk, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (RaP Study/STAR-03).

Authors:  Carmine Pinto; Maurizio Di Bisceglie; Francesca Di Fabio; Annamaria Bochicchio; Tiziana Latiano; Stefano Cordio; Gerardo Rosati; Carlo Aschele; Antonella Marino; Francesca Bergamo; Sara Bustreo; Luca Frassineti; Fortunato Ciardiello; Angela Damato; Stefania Giaquinta; Daniela Baldari; Luca Boni
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 5.  Selective use of radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Campbell S Roxburgh; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies.

Authors:  Robert Glynne-Jones; Miranda Kronfli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes with radiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wendy Lee; Rebecca Nelson; Yasir Akmal; Brian Mailey; Shaun McKenzie; Avo Artinyan; Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa; Yi-Jen Chen; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Joseph Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Germline and somatic genetic predictors of pathological response in neoadjuvant settings of rectal and esophageal cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L E Salnikova; D S Kolobkov
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.550

9.  An update on preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Gu Yeo; Dae Yong Kim
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31

10.  Cetuximab in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer - term outcome of the XERT trial.

Authors:  Vaneja Velenik; Janja Ocvirk; Irena Oblak; Franc Anderluh
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.