PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding concurrent nimotuzumab to preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with rectal cancer (clinical stage T3/4 or N+) were scheduled to receive weekly nimotuzumab (400 mg; days -6, 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2)) was delivered orally twice daily for the duration of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered at 50.4 Gy (45 + 5.4 Gy). The main endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with T3 or T4 disease were enrolled; 66.7 % were nodal-positive; the median distance from the anal verge was 5.5 cm. A pCR was achieved in four patients (19.0 %); 71.4 % patients obtained moderate or good tumor regression (Grade 2 and 3). Downstaging occurred in 15/21 (71.4 %) patients by T stage and 11/14 (78.6 %) by N stage. The actual dose intensities (median/mean, %) were nimotuzumab (100, 100) and capecitabine (100, 99.5). The most frequent Grade 1/2 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (57.1 %), nausea/vomiting (52.4 %), leukocytopenia (47.6 %), diarrhea (47.6 %), and proctitis (38.1 %). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 9.5 % of patients and Grade 3 leukocytopenia in 4.8 %. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that nimotuzumab can be safely combined with radiotherapy plus concurrent capecitabine. The efficacy of this regimen (pCR = 19.0 %) was significantly higher than that observed in previous phase II trials of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and cetuximab in rectal cancer. Further investigation of concurrent nimotuzumab with radiotherapy plus capecitabine is warranted.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding concurrent nimotuzumab to preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with rectal cancer (clinical stage T3/4 or N+) were scheduled to receive weekly nimotuzumab (400 mg; days -6, 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2)) was delivered orally twice daily for the duration of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered at 50.4 Gy (45 + 5.4 Gy). The main endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with T3 or T4 disease were enrolled; 66.7 % were nodal-positive; the median distance from the anal verge was 5.5 cm. A pCR was achieved in four patients (19.0 %); 71.4 % patients obtained moderate or good tumor regression (Grade 2 and 3). Downstaging occurred in 15/21 (71.4 %) patients by T stage and 11/14 (78.6 %) by N stage. The actual dose intensities (median/mean, %) were nimotuzumab (100, 100) and capecitabine (100, 99.5). The most frequent Grade 1/2 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (57.1 %), nausea/vomiting (52.4 %), leukocytopenia (47.6 %), diarrhea (47.6 %), and proctitis (38.1 %). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 9.5 % of patients and Grade 3 leukocytopenia in 4.8 %. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that nimotuzumab can be safely combined with radiotherapy plus concurrent capecitabine. The efficacy of this regimen (pCR = 19.0 %) was significantly higher than that observed in previous phase II trials of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and cetuximab in rectal cancer. Further investigation of concurrent nimotuzumab with radiotherapy plus capecitabine is warranted.
Authors: Hye Jin Choi; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Chang Geol Lee; Hyo Sub Shim; Ik-Jae Lee; Woo Ick Yang; Ji Eun Kwon; Se Kyu Kim; Moo-Suk Park; Ju Hee Lee; Joo Hang Kim Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: J-P Machiels; C Sempoux; P Scalliet; J-C Coche; Y Humblet; E Van Cutsem; J Kerger; J-L Canon; M Peeters; S Aydin; S Laurent; A Kartheuser; B Coster; S Roels; J-F Daisne; B Honhon; L Duck; C Kirkove; M-A Bonny; K Haustermans Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Luca Cionini; Antonino De Paoli; Claus Rodel; Robert Glynne-Jones; Claudio Coco; Mario Romano; Giovanna Mantello; Silvia Palazzi; Falchetti Osti Mattia; Maria Luisa Friso; Domenico Genovesi; Cristiana Vidali; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Alberto Buffoli; Marco Lupattelli; Maria Silvia Favretto; Giuseppe La Torre Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: C Pinto; F Di Fabio; E Maiello; S Pini; T Latiano; C Aschele; C Garufi; A Bochicchio; G Rosati; G Aprile; S Giaquinta; V Torri; A Bardelli; M Gion; A Martoni Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Reinhard Kopp; Elisabeth Rothbauer; Elisabeth Mueller; Friedrich Wilhelm Schildberg; Karl-Walter Jauch; Andreas Pfeiffer Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Mario E Lacouture; Milan Anadkat; Aminah Jatoi; Tamer Garawin; Chet Bohac; Edith Mitchell Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 4.481