BACKGROUND: Infection occurs after approximately 1% of hernia repair procedures. The resistance to infection of the repair materials is therefore an important consideration. We evaluated the infection resistance of five different materials in a rat model of body wall repair, two of which, urinary bladder matrix (UBM-ECM) and Revive, were not previously evaluated in a controlled model of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An inoculum of 1 × 10(8) colony forming units of Staphylococcus aureus was delivered to the wound site following implantation of an autograft, UBM-ECM, Proceed, Prolene, or Revive. Infection was monitored by white blood cell counts, body temperature, bacterial culture, and histomorphologic analysis of the implant site. RESULTS: Infection was shown in all groups through increased white blood cell count and body temperature. Animals with UBM-ECM returned to pre-surgery body temperature before all other groups. Substantial bacterial clearance was found in the autograft, UBM-ECM, and Prolene. Histomorphologic analysis showed evidence for persistent bacterial infection in Prolene, Proceed, and Revive 28 d after implantation, whereas the autograft and UBM-ECM appeared free of infection. The autograft showed a pyogranulomatous inflammatory reaction at 28 d while UBM-ECM was similar to uninfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: Superior infection resistance was shown by UBM-ECM compared with the other materials, which were substantially equivalent. Histomorphologic analysis clearly showed an increased ability to resist persistent bacterial infection for UBM-ECM. Our results suggest UBM-ECM may be useful as a repair material in areas of high risk for infection.
BACKGROUND: Infection occurs after approximately 1% of hernia repair procedures. The resistance to infection of the repair materials is therefore an important consideration. We evaluated the infection resistance of five different materials in a rat model of body wall repair, two of which, urinary bladder matrix (UBM-ECM) and Revive, were not previously evaluated in a controlled model of infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An inoculum of 1 × 10(8) colony forming units of Staphylococcus aureus was delivered to the wound site following implantation of an autograft, UBM-ECM, Proceed, Prolene, or Revive. Infection was monitored by white blood cell counts, body temperature, bacterial culture, and histomorphologic analysis of the implant site. RESULTS: Infection was shown in all groups through increased white blood cell count and body temperature. Animals with UBM-ECM returned to pre-surgery body temperature before all other groups. Substantial bacterial clearance was found in the autograft, UBM-ECM, and Prolene. Histomorphologic analysis showed evidence for persistent bacterial infection in Prolene, Proceed, and Revive 28 d after implantation, whereas the autograft and UBM-ECM appeared free of infection. The autograft showed a pyogranulomatous inflammatory reaction at 28 d while UBM-ECM was similar to uninfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: Superior infection resistance was shown by UBM-ECM compared with the other materials, which were substantially equivalent. Histomorphologic analysis clearly showed an increased ability to resist persistent bacterial infection for UBM-ECM. Our results suggest UBM-ECM may be useful as a repair material in areas of high risk for infection.
Authors: O Guillaume; B Pérez Kohler; R Fortelny; H Redl; F Moriarty; R G Richards; D Eglin; A Petter Puchner Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Vineet Agrawal; Stephen Tottey; Scott A Johnson; John M Freund; Bernard F Siu; Stephen F Badylak Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Matthew T Wolf; Christopher A Carruthers; Christopher L Dearth; Peter M Crapo; Alexander Huber; Olivia A Burnsed; Ricardo Londono; Scott A Johnson; Kerry A Daly; Elizabeth C Stahl; John M Freund; Christopher J Medberry; Lisa E Carey; Alejandro Nieponice; Nicholas J Amoroso; Stephen F Badylak Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Germán R Jiménez-Gastélum; Elsa M Aguilar-Medina; Eduardo Soto-Sainz; Rosalío Ramos-Payán; Erika L Silva-Benítez Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: M Rizwan Sohail; Zerelda Esquer Garrigos; Claude S Elayi; Kun Xiang; John N Catanzaro Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 1.976