Literature DB >> 20888418

The search for an optimal DNA, RNA, and protein detection by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and solution-based methods.

Fengting Yan1, Xin Wu, Melissa Crawford, Wenrui Duan, Emily E Wilding, Li Gao, S Patrick Nana-Sinkam, Miguel A Villalona-Calero, Robert A Baiocchi, Gregory A Otterson.   

Abstract

Clinical trials and correlative laboratory research are increasingly reliant upon archived paraffin-embedded samples. Therefore, the proper processing of biological samples is an important step to sample preservation and for downstream analyses like the detection of a wide variety of targets including micro RNA, DNA and proteins. This paper analyzed the question whether routine fixation of cells and tissues in 10% buffered formalin is optimal for in situ and solution phase analyses by comparing this fixative to a variety of cross linking and alcohol (denaturing) fixatives. We examined the ability of nine commonly used fixative regimens to preserve cell morphology and DNA/RNA/protein quality for these applications. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and bovine papillomavirus (BPV)-infected tissues and cells were used as our model systems. Our evaluation showed that the optimal fixative in cell preparations for molecular hybridization techniques was "gentle" fixative with a cross-linker such as paraformaldehyde or a short incubation in 10% buffered formalin. The optimal fixatives for tissue were either paraformaldehyde or low concentration of formalin (5% of formalin). Methanol was the best of the non cross-linking fixatives for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. For PCR-based detection of DNA or RNA, some denaturing fixatives like acetone and methanol as well as "gentle" cross-linking fixatives like paraformaldehyde out-performed other fixatives. Long term fixation was not proposed for DNA/RNA-based assays. The typical long-term fixation of cells and tissues in 10% buffered formalin is not optimal for combined analyses by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, or--if one does not have unfixed tissues--solution phase PCR. Rather, we recommend short term less intense cross linking fixation if one wishes to use the same cells/tissue for in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and solution phase PCR. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888418      PMCID: PMC3375896          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative mRNA expression analysis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using 5' nuclease quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  T E Godfrey; S H Kim; M Chavira; D W Ruff; R S Warren; J W Gray; R H Jensen
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Molecular profiling of clinical tissue specimens: feasibility and applications.

Authors:  M R Emmert-Buck; R L Strausberg; D B Krizman; M F Bonaldo; R F Bonner; D G Bostwick; M R Brown; K H Buetow; R F Chuaqui; K A Cole; P H Duray; C R Englert; J W Gillespie; S Greenhut; L Grouse; L W Hillier; K S Katz; R D Klausner; V Kuznetzov; A E Lash; G Lennon; W M Linehan; L A Liotta; M A Marra; P J Munson; D K Ornstein; V V Prabhu; C Prange; G D Schuler; M B Soares; C M Tolstoshev; C D Vocke; R H Waterston
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies.

Authors:  John W Gillespie; Carolyn J M Best; Verena E Bichsel; Kristina A Cole; Susan F Greenhut; Stephen M Hewitt; Mamoun Ahram; Yvonne B Gathright; Maria J Merino; Robert L Strausberg; Jonathan I Epstein; Stanley R Hamilton; Gallya Gannot; Galina V Baibakova; Valerie S Calvert; Michael J Flaig; Rodrigo F Chuaqui; Judi C Herring; John Pfeifer; Emmanuel F Petricoin; W Marston Linehan; Paul H Duray; G Steven Bova; Michael R Emmert-Buck
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Mythily Srinivasan; Daniel Sedmak; Scott Jewell
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Vaccines to prevent infections by oncoviruses.

Authors:  John T Schiller; Douglas R Lowy
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry--issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment I.

Authors:  R A Walker
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  The surgical and cytopathology of viral infections: utility of immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and in situ polymerase chain reaction amplification.

Authors:  Gerard J Nuovo
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.090

8.  Histomorphologic assessment of formalin substitute fixatives for diagnostic surgical pathology.

Authors:  Michael E Titford; Marcelo G Horenstein
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Comparison of formalin, buffered formalin, and Bouin's fixation on the detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid from genital lesions.

Authors:  G J Nuovo; S J Silverstein
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.662

10.  Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR.

Authors:  Caifu Chen; Dana A Ridzon; Adam J Broomer; Zhaohui Zhou; Danny H Lee; Julie T Nguyen; Maura Barbisin; Nan Lan Xu; Vikram R Mahuvakar; Mark R Andersen; Kai Qin Lao; Kenneth J Livak; Karl J Guegler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Detection of single influenza viral RNA in cells using a polymeric sequence probe.

Authors:  Suxian Huang; Chaoran Yu; Genhong Cheng; Yong Chen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Elucidating the Burden of HIV in Tissues Using Multiplexed Immunofluorescence and In Situ Hybridization: Methods for the Single-Cell Phenotypic Characterization of Cells Harboring HIV In Situ.

Authors:  Joshua J Vasquez; Rajaa Hussien; Brandon Aguilar-Rodriguez; Henrik Junger; Dejan Dobi; Timothy J Henrich; Cassandra Thanh; Erica Gibson; Louise E Hogan; Joseph McCune; Peter W Hunt; Cheryl A Stoddart; Zoltan G Laszik
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Simultaneous quantification of active carbon- and nitrogen-fixing communities and estimation of fixation rates using fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Allison S McInnes; Alicia K Shepard; Eric J Raes; Anya M Waite; Antonietta Quigg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Detecting G protein-coupled receptor complexes in postmortem human brain with proximity ligation assay and a Bayesian classifier.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; József Mészáros; Roman Walle; Rongxi Fan; Ziyi Sun; Andrew J Dwork; Pierre Trifilieff; Jonathan A Javitch
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 5.  Next-Generation Sequencing Coupled With in situ Hybridization: A Novel Diagnostic Platform to Investigate Swine Emerging Pathogens and New Variants of Endemic Viruses.

Authors:  Talita P Resende; Lacey Marshall Lund; Stephanie Rossow; Fabio A Vannucci
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-15

6.  Using In Situ Padlock Probe Technology to Detect mRNA Splice Variants in Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Lilli Hofmann; Thomas Kroneis; Amin El-Heliebi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.