Literature DB >> 20888033

Use of the valveless trocar system reduces carbon dioxide absorption during laparoscopy when compared with standard trocars.

Amin S Herati1, Sero Andonian, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Mohamed A Atalla, Arun K Srinivasan, Lee Richstone, Louis R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare a novel type of valveless trocar that creates a curtain of pressurized carbon dioxide [CO(2)] gas (which maintains pneumoperitoneum at a lower gas flow rate) with standard trocars; to quantify the volume of CO(2) used; and to characterize CO(2) elimination during laparoscopic renal surgery.
METHODS: A total of 51 patients undergoing laparoscopic renal surgery by a single surgeon were prospectively evaluated using either the valveless trocar (n = 26) or standard trocars (n = 25). Patient demographics, operative time, volume of CO(2) gas consumed, CO(2) elimination, perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: Both patient cohorts were comparable in their preoperative demographics, including body mass index, the number of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and smoking history. Mean operative time was lower in the valveless trocar cohort (124.1 minutes) compared with the conventional trocar group (145.6 minutes), P = .047. Use of the valveless trocar was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative CO(2) consumed (120.0 ± 82.8 vs 300.6 ± 191.5; P < .001) and reduced CO(2) elimination compared with standard trocar use after the first 16 minutes of insufflation (P < .05). Minimal complications occurred, including 2 cases of subcutaneous emphysema in the valveless trocar group, and 1 case of respiratory acidosis in the conventional trocar group.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a valveless trocar significantly reduced CO(2) consumption during transperitoneal laparoscopy. The valveless trocar also demonstrated significantly reduced CO(2) elimination and absorption when compared with the standard trocar.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20888033     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Utilization of a novel valveless trocar system during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Reinhard Wimhofer; Kate V Viola; Markus Pernegger; Walter Costamoling; Louis R Kavoussi; Wolfgang Loidl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Benchtop evaluation of pressure barrier insufflator and standard insufflator systems.

Authors:  Kenneth G Nepple; Dorina Kallogjeri; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Bilateral Otorrhagia after Robotically Assisted Gynecologic Surgery in the Setting of a Reduced Trendelenburg Position and Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alessia Aloisi; Julianna E Pesce; Sarah E Paraghamian; Dennis S Chi; Elizabeth F Rieth
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 5.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

Review 6.  Clinical and Organizational Impact of the AIRSEAL® Insufflation System During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Balayssac; Marie Selvy; Anthony Martelin; Caroline Giroudon; Delphine Cabelguenne; Xavier Armoiry
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Robotic partial nephrectomy performed with Airseal versus a standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Filippo Annino; Luca Topazio; Domenico Autieri; Tiziano Verdacchi; Michele De Angelis; Anastasios D Asimakopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Subcutaneous emphysema--beyond the pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Comparison of a standard CO₂ pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruzica Rosalia Luketina; Michael Knauer; Gernot Köhler; Oliver Owen Koch; Klaus Strasser; Margot Egger; Klaus Emmanuel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Massive subcutaneous emphysema in robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Hatice Celik; Angela Cremins; Keisha A Jones; Oz Harmanli
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.