Literature DB >> 20887932

An analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament isometric position using an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography-based knee joint model.

Woon-Seob Jeong1, Yon-Sik Yoo, Do-Young Kim, Nagraj S Shetty, Patrick Smolinski, Kartik Logishetty, Anil Ranawat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the isometric point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on insertional locations identified in recent anatomic studies by use of a 3-dimensional knee model.
METHODS: Ten living subjects with healthy knees were evaluated. High-resolution computed tomography scans were performed at 3 positions of 0°, 90°, and 135°, and 3-dimensional knee images were constructed. Customized software was used to define tibial and femoral insertion points of the PCL, based on recently described anatomy. The femoral attachment site of the PCL was divided into 4 sectors (labeled A through D), and the tibial attachment site was divided into 6 sectors (labeled 1 through 6). Twenty-four virtual PCL bundles were created between these sectors, and their length was measured in the 3 knee flexion positions.
RESULTS: In 0° and 90° of knee flexion, the virtual bundle showing the least amount of length change (1.10 ± 0.66 mm) was at sector D-6, that is, a posteromedial bundle inserting into the most posterior femoral sector (sector D) and the most distal tibial sector (sector 6). This change was not significantly different compared with all other virtual bundles with tibial points connected to femoral sector D (P > .05). An isometric position for the PCL (length change <2 mm) could not be found in 135° of knee flexion because of lengthening of all virtual bundles.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the femoral attachment point is more important than the tibial attachment point: any of the 6 tibial bundles attached to the most posterior femoral sector had similar isometric properties. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Reproducing normal tibial and femoral anatomy underpins PCL surgical reconstruction. These findings suggest that to perform an isometrically accurate PCL reconstruction, particular attention should be paid to the location of the femoral attachment site, once the tibial footprint has been established. There were no isometric points in any virtual PCL bundle in the fully flexed knee because of excessive lengthening. Therefore, to avoid lengthening of the reconstructed graft, we recommend that fixation is performed at knee flexion angles between 0° and 90° and that patients avoid high flexion during postoperative rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887932     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of length measurements on three-dimensional computed tomography using open-source OsiriX software.

Authors:  Gihyeon Kim; Ho-Joong Jung; Han-Jun Lee; Jae-Sung Lee; Seungbum Koo; Seung-Hwan Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  A historical perspective of PCL bracing.

Authors:  Kyle S Jansson; Kerry E Costello; Luke O'Brien; Coen A Wijdicks; Robert F Laprade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The isometry of two different paths for remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Jung; Jin Hong Kim; Han Jun Lee; Seungbum Koo; Seung-Hwan Chang; Young Bok Jung; Sang Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Julio Domenech; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro.

Authors:  Philippe Greiner; Robert A Magnussen; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret; Elvire Servien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.

Authors:  Yuanjun Teng; Lijun Da; Gengxin Jia; Jie Hu; Zhongcheng Liu; Shifeng Zhang; Hua Han; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In vivo posterior cruciate ligament elongation in running activity after anatomic and non-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Eric Thorhauer; Karl Bowman; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Loading Patterns of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in the Healthy Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  S H Hosseini Nasab; Renate List; Katja Oberhofer; Sandro F Fucentese; Jess G Snedeker; William R Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Femoral graft-tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis with 3-dimensional models and cadaveric experiments.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Yong-Min Chun; Sung-Hwan Kim; Hong-Kyo Moon; Jae-Won Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Naomi C Adam; S H Hosseini Nasab; William R Taylor; Colin R Smith
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.