Literature DB >> 20887130

Outcomes after a purely endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Peter G Campbell1, Erin Kenning, David W Andrews, Sanjay Yadla, Marc Rosen, James J Evans.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Using strict biochemical remission criteria, the authors assessed surgical outcomes after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas and identified preoperative factors that significantly influence the rate of remission.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. The authors reviewed cases in which an endoscopic resection of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas was performed. The cohort consisted of 26 patients who had been followed for 3-60 months (mean 24.5 months). The thresholds of an age-appropriate, normalized insulin-like growth factor-I concentration, a nadir GH level after oral glucose load of less than 1.0 μg/l, and a random GH value of less than 2.5 μg/l were required to establish biochemical cure postoperatively.
RESULTS: Overall, in 57.7% of patients undergoing a purely endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenectomy for acromegaly, an endocrinological cure was achieved. The mean clinical follow-up duration was 24.5 months. In patients with microadenomas (4 cases) the cure rate was 75%, whereas in patients harboring macroadenomas (22 cases) the cure rate was 54.5%. Cavernous sinus invasion (Knosp Grades 3 and 4) was associated with a significantly lower remission rate (p = 0.0068). Hardy Grade 3 and 4 tumors were also less likely to achieve biochemical cure (p = 0.013). The overall complication rate was 11.5% including 2 incidents of transient diabetes insipidus and 1 postoperative CSF leak, which were treated nonoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: A purely endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to GH-secreting pituitary adenomas leads to similar outcome for noninvasive macroadenomas compared with traditional microsurgical techniques. Furthermore, this approach may often provide maximal visualization of the tumor, the pituitary gland, and the surrounding neurovascular structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887130     DOI: 10.3171/2010.7.FOCUS10153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  24 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus microscopic approach for surgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Hussein Fathalla; Michael D Cusimano; Antonio Di Ieva; John Lee; Omar Alsharif; Jeannette Goguen; Stanley Zhang; Harley Smyth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: outcomes in 53 patients using 2010 consensus criteria for remission.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Matthew J Tormenti; Alessandro Paluzzi; William E Rothfus; Yue-Fang Chang; Hanady Zainah; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman; Sue M Challinor; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological comparison of sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas: a single center experience from a cohort of 131 patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Amy A Swanson; Dana Erickson; Diane Mary Donegan; Sarah M Jenkins; Jamie J Van Gompel; John L D Atkinson; Bradley J Erickson; Caterina Giannini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  The surgical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Sven-Martin Schlaffer
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Acromegaly: surgical results in 548 patients.

Authors:  Cecilia Fernández Mateos; Maria García-Uria; Tomás Lucas Morante; José García-Uría
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Surgery induced hypopituitarism in acromegalic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results.

Authors:  Pedro Carvalho; Eva Lau; Davide Carvalho
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Factors associated with biochemical remission after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly.

Authors:  Hai Sun; Jessica Brzana; Chris G Yedinak; Sakir H Gultekin; Johnny B Delashaw; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-09-09

9.  Diabetes Insipidus following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma.

Authors:  Abdulrazag M Ajlan; Sarah Bin Abdulqader; Achal S Achrol; Yousef Aljamaan; Abdullah H Feroze; Laurence Katznelson; Griffith R Harsh
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-03

10.  Predictors of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery outcome in acromegaly: patient and tumor characteristics evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christa C van Bunderen; Nadège C van Varsseveld; Johannes C Baayen; Wouter R van Furth; Esther Sanchez Aliaga; Marieke J Hazewinkel; Charles B L M Majoie; Nicole J M Freling; Paul Lips; Eric Fliers; Peter H Bisschop; Madeleine L Drent
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.