Pedro Carvalho1, Eva Lau2,3,4, Davide Carvalho2,3,4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. carvalho.pmt@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. 3. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. 4. Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hypopituitarism is a possible complication of the surgical treatment of acromegaly. However, there is a wide variability in the incidence rates of surgery-induced hypopituitarism. The purpose of this study was the systematic collection and synthesis of information on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, panhypopituitarism, specific axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgery for acromegaly treatment. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all the papers that have reported pituitary deficits after surgery for acromegaly published up until December 2014, in the PubMed database. We identified 92 studies enrolling 6988 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence rates. We also performed several subgroup analyses to evaluate the impact of both surgical technique, and treatment prior to surgery, on the results. RESULTS: The weighted incidence rates were 12.79 % for hypopituitarism (95 % CI 9.88-16.00 %), 2.50 % for panhypopituitarism (95 % CI 1.24-4.15 %), 6.50 % for ACTH deficiency (95 % CI 4.07-9.44 %), 4.39 % for TSH deficiency (95 % CI 2.99-6.04 %), 6.70 % for FSH/LH deficiency (95 % CI 3.89-10.17 %), 14.95 % for GH deficiency (95 % CI 7.25-24.64 %), 10.05 % for transient (95 % CI 7.18-13.33 %) and 2.42 % for permanent diabetes insipidus (95 % CI 1.70-3.27 %). CONCLUSION: Our study provides new data on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, specific pituitary axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgical treatment of acromegaly. Somatotroph function appears to be more prone to deficit than the other axes. However, there is a high heterogeneity between studies and several factors may influence the incidence of hypopituitarism.
PURPOSE:Hypopituitarism is a possible complication of the surgical treatment of acromegaly. However, there is a wide variability in the incidence rates of surgery-induced hypopituitarism. The purpose of this study was the systematic collection and synthesis of information on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, panhypopituitarism, specific axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgery for acromegaly treatment. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all the papers that have reported pituitary deficits after surgery for acromegaly published up until December 2014, in the PubMed database. We identified 92 studies enrolling 6988 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence rates. We also performed several subgroup analyses to evaluate the impact of both surgical technique, and treatment prior to surgery, on the results. RESULTS: The weighted incidence rates were 12.79 % for hypopituitarism (95 % CI 9.88-16.00 %), 2.50 % for panhypopituitarism (95 % CI 1.24-4.15 %), 6.50 % for ACTH deficiency (95 % CI 4.07-9.44 %), 4.39 % for TSH deficiency (95 % CI 2.99-6.04 %), 6.70 % for FSH/LH deficiency (95 % CI 3.89-10.17 %), 14.95 % for GH deficiency (95 % CI 7.25-24.64 %), 10.05 % for transient (95 % CI 7.18-13.33 %) and 2.42 % for permanent diabetes insipidus (95 % CI 1.70-3.27 %). CONCLUSION: Our study provides new data on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, specific pituitary axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgical treatment of acromegaly. Somatotroph function appears to be more prone to deficit than the other axes. However, there is a high heterogeneity between studies and several factors may influence the incidence of hypopituitarism.
Authors: P De; D A Rees; N Davies; R John; J Neal; R G Mills; J Vafidis; J S Davies; M F Scanlon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: B Swearingen; F G Barker; L Katznelson; B M Biller; S Grinspoon; A Klibanski; N Moayeri; P M Black; N T Zervas Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Petersenn; M Christ-Crain; M Droste; R Finke; J Flitsch; I Kreitschmann-Andermahr; A Luger; J Schopohl; G Stalla Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Alin Abreu; Alejandro Pinzón Tovar; Rafael Castellanos; Alex Valenzuela; Claudia Milena Gómez Giraldo; Alejandro Castellanos Pinedo; Doly Pantoja Guerrero; Carlos Alfonso Builes Barrera; Humberto Ignacio Franco; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Lucio Vilar; Raquel S Jallad; Felipe Gaia Duarte; Mônica Gadelha; Cesar Luiz Boguszewski; Julio Abucham; Luciana A Naves; Nina Rosa C Musolino; Maria Estela Justamante de Faria; Ciliana Rossato; Marcello D Bronstein Journal: Pituitary Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.107