Literature DB >> 20887058

Intrinsic noise and division cycle effects on an abstract biological oscillator.

Michail Stamatakis1, Nikos V Mantzaris.   

Abstract

Oscillatory dynamics are common in biological pathways, emerging from the coupling of positive and negative feedback loops. Due to the small numbers of molecules typically contained in cellular volumes, stochastic effects may play an important role in system behavior. Thus, for moderate noise strengths, stochasticity has been shown to enhance signal-to-noise ratios or even induce oscillations in a class of phenomena referred to as "stochastic resonance" and "coherence resonance," respectively. Furthermore, the biological oscillators are subject to influences from the division cycle of the cell. In this paper we consider a biologically relevant oscillator and investigate the effect of intrinsic noise as well as division cycle which encompasses the processes of growth, DNA duplication, and cell division. We first construct a minimal reaction network which can oscillate in the presence of large or negligible timescale separation. We then derive corresponding deterministic and stochastic models and compare their dynamical behaviors with respect to (i) the extent of the parameter space where each model can exhibit oscillatory behavior and (ii) the oscillation characteristics, namely, the amplitude and the period. We further incorporate division cycle effects on both models and investigate the effect of growth rate on system behavior. Our results show that in the presence but not in the absence of large timescale separation, coherence resonance effects result in extending the oscillatory region and lowering the period for the stochastic model. When the division cycle is taken into account, the oscillatory region of the deterministic model is shown to extend or shrink for moderate or high growth rates, respectively. Further, under the influence of the division cycle, the stochastic model can oscillate for parameter sets for which the deterministic model does not. The division cycle is also found to be able to resonate with the oscillator, thereby enhancing oscillation robustness. The results of this study can give valuable insight into the complex interplay between oscillatory intracellular dynamics and various noise sources, stemming from gene expression, cell growth, and division.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20887058      PMCID: PMC2955726          DOI: 10.1063/1.3484868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chaos        ISSN: 1054-1500            Impact factor:   3.642


  30 in total

1.  Circadian clocks limited by noise.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Recycling the cell cycle: cyclins revisited.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Stochastic resonance in biology. How noise can enhance detection of weak signals and help improve biological information processing.

Authors:  Peter Hänggi
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Stochastic simulation of the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Daniel B Forger; Charles S Peskin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Circadian rhythms in microorganisms: new complexities.

Authors:  Patricia L Lakin-Thomas; Stuart Brody
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Light-noise-induced suprathreshold circadian oscillations and coherent resonance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ming Yi; Ya Jia
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-07-18

7.  How does intracellular Ca2+ oscillate: by chance or by the clock?

Authors:  Alexander Skupin; Helmut Kettenmann; Ulrike Winkler; Maria Wartenberg; Heinrich Sauer; Stephen C Tovey; Colin W Taylor; Martin Falcke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression.

Authors:  H H McAdams; A Arkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Extrinsic noise passing through a Michaelis-Menten reaction: a universal response of a genetic switch.

Authors:  Anna Ochab-Marcinek
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Derek Abbott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intrinsic noise and division cycle effects on an abstract biological oscillator.

Authors:  Michail Stamatakis; Nikos V Mantzaris
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.642

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.