BACKGROUND: Data regarding the familial aggregation of left ventricular (LV) geometry and its relations to parental heart failure (HF) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated concordance of LV geometry within 1093 nuclear families in 5758 participants of the original (parents) (n=2351) and offspring (n=3407) cohorts of the Framingham Heart Study undergoing routine echocardiography in mid- to late adulthood. LV geometry was categorized based on cohort- and sex-specific 80th percentile cutoffs of LV mass and relative wall thickness (RWT) into normal (both <80th percentile), concentric remodeling (LV mass <80th percentile; RWT >80th percentile), concentric hypertrophy (both >80th percentile), and eccentric hypertrophy (LV mass >80th percentile; RWT <80th percentile). Within nuclear families, LV geometry was concordant among related pairs (parent-child, sibling-sibling) (P=0.0015) but not among unrelated spousal pairs (P=0.60), a finding that remained unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates known to influence LV remodeling (age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index), excluding individuals with prevalent HF and myocardial infarction, and varying the thresholds for defining LV geometry. The prevalence of abnormal LV geometry was higher in family members of affected individuals, with recurrence risks of 1.4 for concentric remodeling (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.7) and eccentric hypertrophy (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8) and 3.9 (95% CI, 3.2 to 4.6) for concentric hypertrophy. In a subset of 1497 offspring, we observed an association between parental HF (n=458) and eccentric hypertrophy in offspring (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of a 2-generational community-based sample demonstrates familial aggregation of LV geometry, with the greatest recurrence risk for concentric LV geometry, and establishes an association between eccentric LV geometry and parental HF.
BACKGROUND: Data regarding the familial aggregation of left ventricular (LV) geometry and its relations to parental heart failure (HF) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated concordance of LV geometry within 1093 nuclear families in 5758 participants of the original (parents) (n=2351) and offspring (n=3407) cohorts of the Framingham Heart Study undergoing routine echocardiography in mid- to late adulthood. LV geometry was categorized based on cohort- and sex-specific 80th percentile cutoffs of LV mass and relative wall thickness (RWT) into normal (both <80th percentile), concentric remodeling (LV mass <80th percentile; RWT >80th percentile), concentric hypertrophy (both >80th percentile), and eccentric hypertrophy (LV mass >80th percentile; RWT <80th percentile). Within nuclear families, LV geometry was concordant among related pairs (parent-child, sibling-sibling) (P=0.0015) but not among unrelated spousal pairs (P=0.60), a finding that remained unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates known to influence LV remodeling (age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index), excluding individuals with prevalent HF and myocardial infarction, and varying the thresholds for defining LV geometry. The prevalence of abnormal LV geometry was higher in family members of affected individuals, with recurrence risks of 1.4 for concentric remodeling (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.7) and eccentric hypertrophy (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8) and 3.9 (95% CI, 3.2 to 4.6) for concentric hypertrophy. In a subset of 1497 offspring, we observed an association between parental HF (n=458) and eccentric hypertrophy in offspring (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of a 2-generational community-based sample demonstrates familial aggregation of LV geometry, with the greatest recurrence risk for concentric LV geometry, and establishes an association between eccentric LV geometry and parental HF.
Authors: Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D K Arnett; Y Hong; J N Bella; A Oberman; D W Kitzman; P N Hopkins; D C Rao; R B Devereux Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Mark H Drazner; J Eduardo Rame; Emily K Marino; John S Gottdiener; Dalane W Kitzman; Julius M Gardin; Teri A Manolio; Daniel L Dries; David S Siscovick Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Douglas L Mann; Michael A Acker; Mariell Jessup; Hani N Sabbah; Randall C Starling; Spencer H Kubo Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Hani N Sabbah; Victor G Sharov; Ramesh C Gupta; Sudhish Mishra; Sharad Rastogi; Albertas I Undrovinas; Pervaiz A Chaudhry; Anastassia Todor; Takayuki Mishima; Elaine J Tanhehco; George Suzuki Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-10-16 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Ana V Villar; Miguel Llano; Manuel Cobo; Víctor Expósito; Ramón Merino; Rafael Martín-Durán; María A Hurlé; J Francisco Nistal Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Johan Sundström; Lisa Sullivan; Jacob Selhub; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Paul F Jacques; Irwin H Rosenberg; Daniel Levy; Peter W F Wilson; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nisha I Parikh; Michael J Pencina; Thomas J Wang; Katherine J Lanier; Caroline S Fox; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Am J Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Jayashri Aragam; Thomas J Wang; Gary F Mitchell; Sekar Kathiresan; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Joseph A Vita; Michelle J Keyes; Christopher J O'Donnell; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Vernice R Peterson; Gavin R Norton; Michelle Redelinghuys; Carlos D Libhaber; Muzi J Maseko; Olebogeng H I Majane; Richard Brooksbank; Angela J Woodiwiss Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Susan Cheng; Elizabeth L McCabe; Martin G Larson; Ming-Huei Chen; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stantchev; Jayashri Aragam; Scott D Solomon; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Laura Benschop; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Eric A P Steegers; M Kamran Ikram Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.501