Literature DB >> 20884633

Metabolic profiling detects field effects in nondysplastic tissue from esophageal cancer patients.

Danny Yakoub1, Hector C Keun, Robert Goldin, George B Hanna.   

Abstract

The variable rate of missed cancer in endoscopic biopsies and lack of other biomarkers reduce the effectiveness of surveillance programs in esophageal cancer. Based on the "field cancerization" hypothesis that tumors arise within a transformed field with an altered biochemical phenotype, we sought to test if metabolic profiling could differentiate between histologically normal tissue from individuals with and without esophageal cancer. Thirty-five patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and 52 age-matched controls participated in the study. Using 1H magic angle spinning-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of intact tissue, we generated metabolic profiles of tumor tissue, proximal histologically normal mucosa from cancer patients (PHINOM), and proximal histologically normal mucosa from a control group. Using multivariate regression and receiver-operator characteristic analysis, we identified a panel of metabolites discriminating malignant and histologically normal tissues from cancer patients and from that of controls. Whereas 26% and 12% of the spectral profile regions were uniquely discriminating tumor or control tissue, respectively, 5% of the profile exhibited a significant progressive change in signal intensity from controls to PHINOM to tumor. Regions identified were assigned to phosphocholine (PC), glutamate (Glu), myo-inositol, adenosine-containing compounds, uridine-containing compounds, and inosine. In particular, the PC/Glu ratio in histologically normal tissue signified the presence of esophageal cancer (n=123; area under the curve, 0.84; P<0.001). In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis of the presence of metabonomic field effects in esophageal cancer, even in non-Barrett's segments. This indicates that metabolic profiling of tissue can potentially play a role in the surveillance of cancer by reporting on the phenotypic consequences of field cancerization.
Copyright © 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884633     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  20 in total

1.  Occult progression by Apc-deficient intestinal crypts as a target for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Jared M Fischer; Arnout G Schepers; Hans Clevers; Darryl Shibata; R Michael Liskay
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani J A Konda; Lusik Cherkezyan; Hariharan Subramanian; Kirsten Wroblewski; Dhwanil Damania; Valentin Becker; Mariano Haba Ruiz Gonzalez; Ann Koons; Michael Goldberg; Mark K Ferguson; Irving Waxman; Hermant K Roy; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Candidate serum metabolite biomarkers for differentiating gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, and high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew F Buas; Haiwei Gu; Danijel Djukovic; Jiangjiang Zhu; Lynn Onstad; Brian J Reid; Daniel Raftery; Thomas L Vaughan
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.290

4.  Inferring alterations in cell-to-cell communication in HER2+ breast cancer using secretome profiling of three cell models.

Authors:  David J Klinke; Yogesh M Kulkarni; Yueting Wu; Christina Byrne-Hoffman
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Applications of high-resolution magic angle spinning MRS in biomedical studies II-Human diseases.

Authors:  Christopher Dietz; Felix Ehret; Francesco Palmas; Lindsey A Vandergrift; Yanni Jiang; Vanessa Schmitt; Vera Dufner; Piet Habbel; Johannes Nowak; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  T cell inhibitory mechanisms in a model of aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Authors:  Tamara Hilmenyuk; Carla A Ruckstuhl; Michael Hayoz; Christian Berchtold; Jean-Marc Nuoffer; Shyam Solanki; Hector C Keun; Paul A Beavis; Carsten Riether; Adrian F Ochsenbein
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 7.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Specific Smad2/3 Linker Phosphorylation Indicates Esophageal Non-neoplastic and Neoplastic Stem-Like Cells and Neoplastic Development.

Authors:  Shunsuke Horitani; Toshiro Fukui; Yuji Tanimura; Yasushi Matsumoto; Sachi Miyamoto; Toshihiro Tanaka; Takashi Tomiyama; Tsukasa Ikeura; Yugo Ando; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Feasibility of MR metabolomics for immediate analysis of resection margins during breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tone F Bathen; Brigitte Geurts; Beathe Sitter; Hans E Fjøsne; Steinar Lundgren; Lutgarde M Buydens; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Geert Postma; Guro F Giskeødegård
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  1H-NMR based metabonomic profiling of human esophageal cancer tissue.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Jie Chen; Longqi Chen; Pengchi Deng; Qian Bu; Pu Xiang; Manli Li; Wenjie Lu; Youzhi Xu; Hongjun Lin; Tianming Wu; Huijuan Wang; Jing Hu; Xiaoni Shao; Xiaobo Cen; Ying-Lan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.