Literature DB >> 20884575

Asymmetry of visual sensory mechanisms: electrophysiological, structural, and psychophysical evidences.

Maria Fátima Silva1, Catarina Mateus, Aldina Reis, Sandrina Nunes, Pedro Fonseca, Miguel Castelo-Branco.   

Abstract

Psychophysical visual field asymmetries are widely documented and have been attributed to anatomical anisotropies both at the retinal and cortical levels. This debate on whether such differences originate within the retina itself or are due to higher visual processing may be illuminated if concomitant anatomical, physiological, and psychophysical measures are taken in the same individuals. In the current study, we have focused on the study of objective functional and structural asymmetries at the retinal level and examined their putative correlation with visual performance asymmetries. Forty healthy participants (80 eyes; 13 male and 27 female subjects) were included in this study. Objective functional/structural asymmetries were probed using the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) technique and optical coherence tomography (OCT), respectively. A nasal/temporal pattern of asymmetry (nasal visual hemifield disadvantage) was found for all methods (retinal thickness, contrast sensitivity, and mfERG P1 amplitude). Furthermore, superior/inferior asymmetries could be documented only with psychophysics and structural measures. These patterns likely arise at different levels of the retina as inferred by partly independent correlation patterns. We conclude that patterns of structural/functional asymmetries arise at different levels of visual processing with a strong retinal contribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884575     DOI: 10.1167/10.6.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  Early visual cortical structural changes in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Fábio S Ferreira; João M S Pereira; Aldina Reis; Mafalda Sanches; João V Duarte; Leonor Gomes; Carolina Moreno; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.

Authors:  Kelsey M Keltgen; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Association of electroretinogram and morphological findings in branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema.

Authors:  Hidetaka Noma; Hideharu Funatsu; Seiyo Harino; Takeshi Sugawara; Tatsuya Mimura; Katsunori Shimada
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Perception of differences in naturalistic dynamic scenes, and a V1-based model.

Authors:  Michelle P S To; Iain D Gilchrist; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Extrafoveal changes following intravitreal bevacizumab injections for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: an mfERG and OCT study.

Authors:  Saemi Park; In Hwan Cho; Tae Kwann Park; Woo Ho Nam; Young-Hoon Ohn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Idiopathic, isolated fovea plana with bilateral off-centre multifocal ERGs.

Authors:  Alice D McTrusty; Daphne L McCulloch; Niall C Strang; Angela McCall; Stuart Parks; Alison Brown; Graeme J Kennedy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  In diabetic eyes, multifocal ERG reflects differences in function between the nasal part and the temporal part of the macula.

Authors:  Kristina Holm; Monica Lövestam Adrian
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.