Literature DB >> 20884566

Object form discontinuity facilitates displacement discrimination across saccades.

Maarten Demeyer1, Peter De Graef, Johan Wagemans, Karl Verfaillie.   

Abstract

Stimulus displacements coinciding with a saccadic eye movement are poorly detected by human observers. In recent years, converging evidence has shown that this phenomenon does not result from poor transsaccadic retention of presaccadic stimulus position information, but from the visual system's efforts to spatially align presaccadic and postsaccadic perception on the basis of visual landmarks. It is known that this process can be disrupted, and transsaccadic displacement detection performance can be improved, by briefly blanking the stimulus display during and immediately after the saccade. In the present study, we investigated whether this improvement could also follow from a discontinuity in the task-irrelevant form of the displaced stimulus. We observed this to be the case: Subjects more accurately identified the direction of intrasaccadic displacements when the displaced stimulus simultaneously changed form, compared to conditions without a form change. However, larger improvements were still observed under blanking conditions. In a second experiment, we show that facilitation induced by form changes and blanks can combine. We conclude that a strong assumption of visual stability underlies the suppression of transsaccadic change detection performance, the rejection of which generalizes from stimulus form to stimulus position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884566     DOI: 10.1167/10.6.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

1.  Spatial position information accumulates steadily over time.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; M Concetta Morrone; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An object-mediated updating account of insensitivity to transsaccadic change.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Cathleen M Moore; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Masking produces compression of space and time in the absence of eye movements.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Sabine Born; Gereon R Fink; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Visual perception and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Ibbotson; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Object discrepancy modulates feature prediction across eye movements.

Authors:  Cassandra Philine Köller; Christian H Poth; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  A role of the human thalamus in predicting the perceptual consequences of eye movements.

Authors:  Florian Ostendorf; Daniela Liebermann; Christoph J Ploner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.