Literature DB >> 20884524

The utility of shape attributes in deciphering movements of non-rigid objects.

Elias H Cohen1, Anshul Jain, Qasim Zaidi.   

Abstract

Most moving objects in the world are non-rigid, changing shape as they move. To disentangle shape changes from movements, computational models either fit shapes to combinations of basis shapes or motion trajectories to combinations of oscillations but are biologically unfeasible in their input requirements. Recent neural models parse shapes into stored examples, which are unlikely to exist for general shapes. We propose that extracting shape attributes, e.g., symmetry, facilitates veridical perception of non-rigid motion. In a new method, identical dots were moved in and out along invisible spokes, to simulate the rotation of dynamically and randomly distorting shapes. Discrimination of rotation direction measured as a function of non-rigidity was 90% as efficient as the optimal Bayesian rotation decoder and ruled out models based on combining the strongest local motions. Remarkably, for non-rigid symmetric shapes, observers outperformed the Bayesian model when perceived rotation could correspond only to rotation of global symmetry, i.e., when tracking of shape contours or local features was uninformative. That extracted symmetry can drive perceived motion suggests that shape attributes may provide links across the dorsal-ventral separation between motion and shape processing. Consequently, the perception of non-rigid object motion could be based on representations that highlight global shape attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884524      PMCID: PMC3334828          DOI: 10.1167/10.11.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  48 in total

1.  Rigid objects that appear to bend.

Authors:  A F Griffiths; Q Zaidi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli.

Authors:  C J Duffy; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  K Tanaka; H Saito; Y Fukada; M Moriya
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Object recognition can drive motion perception.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; C Armel; C Foster; R Stoddard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  M W Oram; D I Perrett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision.

Authors:  K Tanaka
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli.

Authors:  A E Seiffert; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Response of monkey MST neurons to optic flow stimuli with shifted centers of motion.

Authors:  C J Duffy; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion.

Authors:  M C Morrone; D C Burr; L M Vaina
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Nonrigid illusory motion in depth induced by translational motion of static images.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Kim; Thomas V Papathomas
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-06-20

4.  What Property of the Contour of a Deforming Region Biases Percepts toward Liquid?

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-15

5.  Illusory Oscillation of the Central Rotation Axis.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakajima; Shohei Kakuda; Shunji Satoh
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-07-25

6.  Mental geometry of three-dimensional size perception.

Authors:  Akihito Maruya; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.