Literature DB >> 20884510

Cue combination on the circle and the sphere.

Richard F Murray1, Yaniv Morgenstern.   

Abstract

Bayesian cue combination models have been used to examine how human observers combine information from several cues to form estimates of linear quantities like depth. Here we develop an analogous theory for circular quantities like planar direction. The circular theory is broadly similar to the linear theory but differs in significant ways. First, in the circular theory the combined estimate is a nonlinear function of the individual cue estimates. Second, in the circular theory the mean of the combined estimate is affected not only by the means of individual cues and the weights assigned to individual cues but also by the variability of individual cues. Third, in the circular theory the combined estimate can be less certain than the individual estimates, if the individual estimates disagree with one another. Fourth, the circular theory does not have some of the closed-form expressions available in the linear theory, so data analysis requires numerical methods. We describe a vector sum model that gives a heuristic approximation to the circular theory's behavior. We also show how the theory can be extended to deal with spherical quantities like direction in three-dimensional space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884510     DOI: 10.1167/10.11.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  The human visual system's assumption that light comes from above is weak.

Authors:  Yaniv Morgenstern; Richard F Murray; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Optimal multiguidance integration in insect navigation.

Authors:  Thierry Hoinville; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visual recency bias is explained by a mixture model of internal representations.

Authors:  Kristjan Kalm; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Forced fusion in multisensory heading estimation.

Authors:  Ksander N de Winkel; Mikhail Katliar; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Complementary congruent and opposite neurons achieve concurrent multisensory integration and segregation.

Authors:  Wen-Hao Zhang; He Wang; Aihua Chen; Yong Gu; Tai Sing Lee; Ky Michael Wong; Si Wu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Natural scene statistics predict how humans pool information across space in surface tilt estimation.

Authors:  Seha Kim; Johannes Burge
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Explaining the effects of distractor statistics in visual search.

Authors:  Joshua Calder-Travis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Experimentally disambiguating models of sensory cue integration.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Causal Inference in the Perception of Verticality.

Authors:  Ksander N de Winkel; Mikhail Katliar; Daniel Diers; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Optimized but Not Maximized Cue Integration for 3D Visual Perception.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Chang; Lowell Thompson; Raymond Doudlah; Byounghoon Kim; Adhira Sunkara; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-01-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.