OBJECTIVE: To (1) quantify the diagnostic techniques used by Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) dentists before they decide to treat primary caries lesions surgically and (2) examine whether certain dentist, practice, and patient characteristics are associated with their use. METHODS: A total of 228 DPBRN dentists recorded information on 5676 consecutive restorations inserted due to primary caries lesions on 3751 patients. Practitioner-investigators placed a mean of 24.9 (SD=12.4) restorations. Lesions were categorised as posterior proximal, anterior proximal, posterior occlusal, posterior smooth, or anterior smooth. Techniques used to diagnose the lesion were categorised as clinical assessment, radiographs, and/or optical. Statistical analysis utilised generalised mixed-model ANOVA to account for the hierarchical structure of the data. RESULTS: By lesion category, the diagnostic technique combinations used most frequently were clinical assessment plus radiographs for posterior proximal (47%), clinical assessment for anterior proximal (51%), clinical assessment for posterior occlusal (46%), clinical assessment for posterior smooth (77%), and clinical assessment for anterior smooth (80%). Diagnostic technique was significantly associated with lesion category after adjusting for clustering in dentists (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results - obtained during actual clinical procedures rather than from questionnaire-based hypothetical scenarios - quantified the diagnostic techniques most commonly used during the actual delivery of routine restorative care. Diagnostic technique varied by lesion category and with certain practice and patient characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: To (1) quantify the diagnostic techniques used by Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) dentists before they decide to treat primary caries lesions surgically and (2) examine whether certain dentist, practice, and patient characteristics are associated with their use. METHODS: A total of 228 DPBRN dentists recorded information on 5676 consecutive restorations inserted due to primary caries lesions on 3751 patients. Practitioner-investigators placed a mean of 24.9 (SD=12.4) restorations. Lesions were categorised as posterior proximal, anterior proximal, posterior occlusal, posterior smooth, or anterior smooth. Techniques used to diagnose the lesion were categorised as clinical assessment, radiographs, and/or optical. Statistical analysis utilised generalised mixed-model ANOVA to account for the hierarchical structure of the data. RESULTS: By lesion category, the diagnostic technique combinations used most frequently were clinical assessment plus radiographs for posterior proximal (47%), clinical assessment for anterior proximal (51%), clinical assessment for posterior occlusal (46%), clinical assessment for posterior smooth (77%), and clinical assessment for anterior smooth (80%). Diagnostic technique was significantly associated with lesion category after adjusting for clustering in dentists (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results - obtained during actual clinical procedures rather than from questionnaire-based hypothetical scenarios - quantified the diagnostic techniques most commonly used during the actual delivery of routine restorative care. Diagnostic technique varied by lesion category and with certain practice and patient characteristics.
Authors: Marcelle M Nascimento; Valeria V Gordan; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; O D Williams; Jeffrey L Fellows; Lloyd K Ritchie; Ivar A Mjör; Jocelyn McClelland; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Sonia K Makhija; Gregg H Gilbert; D Brad Rindal; Paul Benjamin; Joshua S Richman; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Kenneth C Lam; R Curtis Bay; Eric L Sauers; Alison R Snyder Valier Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Gregg H Gilbert; O Dale Williams; James J Korelitz; Jeffrey L Fellows; Valeria V Gordan; Sonia K Makhija; Cyril Meyerowitz; Thomas W Oates; D Brad Rindal; Paul L Benjamin; Patrick J Foy Journal: J Dent Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jeffrey L Fellows; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; Paul Benjamin; Håkan Flink; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Neil Johnson Journal: Am J Dent Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: Ruth McBride; Brian Leroux; Anne Lindblad; O Dale Williams; Maryann Lehmann; D Brad Rindal; Maria Botello-Harbaum; Gregg H Gilbert; Jane Gillette; Catherine Demko Journal: J Dent Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rahma Mungia; Melanie V Taverna; Elisabeth de La Rosa; Lynne P Heilbrun; Pooja Mody; Thomas W Oates; Huyen A Tran; Monica Castillo; Stephanie C Reyes; Marsha G Suttle; Raymond F Palmer Journal: Tex Dent J Date: 2019-11
Authors: Esra Kosan; Joachim Krois; Katja Wingenfeld; Christian Eric Deuter; Robert Gaudin; Falk Schwendicke Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.964