BACKGROUND: Sunitinib and everolimus have been approved for first- and second-line treatment, respectively, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The role of sorafenib, which is approved for second-line treatment after cytokines failure, is presently to be defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether third-line sorafenib after sequential use of sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (everolimus or temsirolimus) is feasible and effective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty medical records of patients with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib between January 2006 and January 2010 were reviewed at four participating centers. Data regarding patients treated with the sequence sunitinib-everolimus or temsirolimus-sorafenib were extracted. Central analysis of radiographic images was performed using RECIST criteria to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (oRR) to sorafenib treatment. MEASUREMENTS: PFS and oRR to sorafenib were the primary end points. Secondary outcomes were safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-four patients were eligible for the study. A median PFS of 4 mo (range: 3-6 mo) and a median OS of 7 mo since sorafenib treatment (range: 6-10 mo) were reported. Of the patients, 23.5% showed response to sorafenib, with an overall disease control rate (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) of 44%. Selection bias, data incompleteness, and absence of study design are inevitable limitations of the study, although central review can strengthen the quality of presented data. CONCLUSIONS: Third-line sorafenib appears to be active and well tolerated in mRCC after first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus or temsirolimus, with no patients interrupting sorafenib because of toxicity or lack of compliance. Prospective, placebo-controlled trials are completely lacking and are required in this setting.
BACKGROUND:Sunitinib and everolimus have been approved for first- and second-line treatment, respectively, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The role of sorafenib, which is approved for second-line treatment after cytokines failure, is presently to be defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether third-line sorafenib after sequential use of sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (everolimus or temsirolimus) is feasible and effective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty medical records of patients with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib between January 2006 and January 2010 were reviewed at four participating centers. Data regarding patients treated with the sequence sunitinib-everolimus or temsirolimus-sorafenib were extracted. Central analysis of radiographic images was performed using RECIST criteria to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (oRR) to sorafenib treatment. MEASUREMENTS: PFS and oRR to sorafenib were the primary end points. Secondary outcomes were safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-four patients were eligible for the study. A median PFS of 4 mo (range: 3-6 mo) and a median OS of 7 mo since sorafenib treatment (range: 6-10 mo) were reported. Of the patients, 23.5% showed response to sorafenib, with an overall disease control rate (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) of 44%. Selection bias, data incompleteness, and absence of study design are inevitable limitations of the study, although central review can strengthen the quality of presented data. CONCLUSIONS: Third-line sorafenib appears to be active and well tolerated in mRCC after first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus or temsirolimus, with no patients interrupting sorafenib because of toxicity or lack of compliance. Prospective, placebo-controlled trials are completely lacking and are required in this setting.
Authors: Joshua E Logan; Edward N Rampersaud; Geoffrey A Sonn; Karim Chamie; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck; Dennis J Slamon; Fairooz F Kabbinavar Journal: Rev Urol Date: 2012
Authors: I Duran; J Lambea; P Maroto; J L González-Larriba; Luis Flores; S Granados-Principal; M Graupera; B Sáez; A Vivancos; O Casanovas Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Suzanne Richter; Jo-An Seah; Gregory R Pond; Hui K Gan; Mary J Mackenzie; Sebastien J Hotte; Som D Mukherjee; Nevin Murray; Christian Kollmannsberger; Daniel Heng; Masoom A Haider; Robert Halford; S Percy Ivy; Malcolm J Moore; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Alexandr Poprach; Zbyněk Bortlíček; Tomáš Büchler; Bohuslav Melichar; Radek Lakomý; Rostislav Vyzula; Petr Brabec; Marek Svoboda; Ladislav Dušek; Jakub Gregor Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2012-06-30 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Camillo Porta; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Cora N Sternberg; Cezary Szczylik; Jakub Zolnierek; Christian Kollmannsberger; Sun Young Rha; Georg A Bjarnason; Bohuslav Melichar; Ugo De Giorgi; Viktor Grünwald; Ian D Davis; Jae-Lyun Lee; Emilio Esteban; Gladys Urbanowitz; Can Cai; Matthew Squires; Mahtab Marker; Michael M Shi; Bernard Escudier Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: M R Matrana; C Duran; A Shetty; L Xiao; B J Atkinson; P Corn; L C Pagliaro; R E Millikan; C Charnsangave; E Jonasch; N M Tannir Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 9.162