Literature DB >> 20883865

Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus after antireflux surgery.

Marc Van Den Eynde1, Anne Jouret-Mourin, Christine Sempoux, Hubert Piessevaux, Pierre H Deprez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation are now established therapies for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal cancer complicating Barrett's esophagus. These techniques may be more challenging in patients with previous antireflux surgery, because of poor visibility and accessibility.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of endoscopic resection for early neoplasia complicating Barrett's esophagus after antireflux surgery.
DESIGN: Case series, retrospective review.
SETTING: Single tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: This study involved 7 patients treated for Barrett's neoplasia by endoscopic resection between 2001 and 2009.
INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic resection was performed by using the EMR cap technique or by endoscopic submucosal dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The curative resection rate, complications, follow-up, and complete remission status were determined.
RESULTS: Seven patients underwent endoscopic resection (mean number of sessions, 3.1; range, 1-6): endoscopic submucosal dissection in 3 patients and EMR in 4 patients. Two patients needed additional argon plasma coagulation. Pathology examination disclosed invasive adenocarcinoma in 3 patients and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 4 patients. At the last follow-up examination, all patients were in complete remission. Major procedure-related complications were not encountered. LIMITATIONS: Small number of patients, single center, retrospective study.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that full endoscopic resection by using EMR or endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with previous antireflux surgery can be achieved successfully and safely. These patients can be treated endoscopically, similarly to patients without previous surgery.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20883865     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of flexible endoscopy in esophageal surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Fabio Nachman; Adolfo Badaloni; Franco Ciotola; Cecilia Zubieta; Mauricio Ramirez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The low incidence of bacteremia after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) obviates the need for prophylactic antibiotics in esophageal ESD.

Authors:  Noboru Kawata; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Kohei Takizawa; Kenichiro Imai; Kinichi Hotta; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Mika Tsukahara; Ichiro Kawamura; Hanako Kurai; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Endoscopic assessment and management of early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ghassan M Hammoud; Hazem Hammad; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia (MESEN) consensus.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Adolfo E Badaloni; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Carlos Pellegrini; Vic Velanovich; Gary W Falk; Kevin Reavis; Lee Swanstrom; Virender K Sharma; Fabio Nachman; Franco F Ciotola; Luis E Caro; Cecilio Cerisoli; Demetrio Cavadas; Luis Durand Figueroa; Daniel Pirchi; Michael Gibson; Santiago Elizalde; Henry Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): still a matter for debate or a gold standard technique in both Western and Eastern countries?

Authors:  Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Barrett's esophagus: The advocacy for ESD.

Authors:  Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.