Literature DB >> 20882588

Metaphyseal fracture healing follows similar biomechanical rules as diaphyseal healing.

Lutz Claes1, Martina Reusch, Melanie Göckelmann, Michael Ohnmacht, Tim Wehner, Michael Amling, Frank T Beil, Anita Ignatius.   

Abstract

It is generally supposed that the pattern of fracture healing in trabecular metaphyseal bone differs from that of diaphyseal fractures. However, few experimental studies to date have been performed, even though clinically many fractures occur in metaphyseal bone. Particularly, the influence of biomechanical factors has not yet been investigated under standardized conditions. Our aim was to correlate the interfragmentary strain (IFS) with the bone-healing outcome in a controlled metaphyseal fracture model in sheep. Twelve sheep received a partial osteotomy in the distal femoral condyle close to the trochlea. The determination of the IFS by in vivo X-ray analyses and a finite element model revealed that the deflection of the osteotomy gap by the patello-femoral force during walking provoked increasing strains of up to 40%. Bone healing was evaluated after 8 weeks by the assessment of the bone mineral density and by histomorphometry in regions of interest that displayed differing magnitudes of IFS. In areas with strains below 5% significantly less bone formation occurred compared to areas with higher strains (6-20%). For strains larger than 20% fibrocartilage layers were observed. Low IFS (<5%) led to intramembranous bone formation, whereas higher strains additionally provoked endochondral ossification or fibrocartilage formation. It is therefore proposed that metaphyseal bone healing follows similar biomechanical principles as diaphyseal healing.
Copyright © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882588     DOI: 10.1002/jor.21227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  17 in total

1.  Biomechanical forces exert anabolic effects on osteoblasts by activation of SMAD 1/5/8 through type 1 BMP receptor.

Authors:  B Rath; J Nam; J Deschner; J Schaumburger; M Tingart; S Grässel; J Grifka; S Agarwal
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 2.  [Dynamization of fracture fixation : Timing and methods].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Special Review: Accelerating fracture repair in humans: a reading of old experiments and recent clinical trials.

Authors:  Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-01-09

Review 4.  Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions.

Authors:  Lutz Claes; Stefan Recknagel; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  [Mechanobiology of fracture healing part 1 : Principles].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Inflammation, fracture and bone repair.

Authors:  Florence Loi; Luis A Córdova; Jukka Pajarinen; Tzu-hua Lin; Zhenyu Yao; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Non-union in 3 of 15 osteotomies of the distal radius without bone graft.

Authors:  Johan H Scheer; Lars E Adolfsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Experimental models for cancellous bone healing in the rat.

Authors:  Magnus Bernhardsson; Olof Sandberg; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Balance Between Mechanical Stability and Mechano-Biology of Fracture Healing Under Volar Locking Plate.

Authors:  Xuanchi Liu; Saeed Miramini; Minoo Patel; JinJing Liao; Darpan Shidid; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Glucocorticoids inhibit shaft fracture healing but not metaphyseal bone regeneration under stable mechanical conditions.

Authors:  O H Sandberg; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.