Tina E Brinkley1, Jingzhong Ding, J Jeffrey Carr, Barbara J Nicklas. 1. Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. tbrinkle@wfubmc.edu
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR) or aerobic exercise can reduce pericardial fat, and these reductions may help improve cardiovascular health. PURPOSE: We examined whether combining CR with aerobic exercise enhances pericardial fat loss compared with a CR-only intervention designed to elicit equivalent reductions in body weight. We also examined the relationship between changes in pericardial fat and changes in maximal oxygen consumption (V˙O2max), a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS:Thirty-two abdominally obese postmenopausal women (mean age=58 yr; 78% Caucasian) were randomly assigned to one of three interventions of equal energy deficit (∼2800 kcal·wk) for 20 wk: CR only (n=8), CR + moderate-intensity exercise (n=15), or CR + vigorous-intensity exercise (n=9). The volume of pericardial fat around the coronary arteries was measured by computed tomography. RESULTS: Women in the CR, CR + moderate-intensity, and CR + vigorous-intensity groups had similar baseline characteristics. The mean ± SD value for pericardial fat before weight loss was 79.07 ± 32.90 cm (range=34.04-152.74 cm), with no difference among groups (P=0.89). All three interventions significantly reduced body weight (15%), waist circumference (10%), and abdominal visceral fat (28%) to a similar degree. There was also a 17% reduction in pericardial fat (-12.75 ± 6.29 cm, P<0.0001), which did not differ among groups (P=0.84). Changes in pericardial fat were inversely correlated with changes in V˙O2max (r=-0.37, P=0.05), but not after adjusting for intervention group and change in body weight. CONCLUSIONS:Weight loss interventions of equal energy deficit have similar effects on pericardial fat in postmenopausal women, regardless of whether the energy deficit is due to CR alone or CR plus aerobic exercise.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Weight loss induced by caloric restriction (CR) or aerobic exercise can reduce pericardial fat, and these reductions may help improve cardiovascular health. PURPOSE: We examined whether combining CR with aerobic exercise enhances pericardial fat loss compared with a CR-only intervention designed to elicit equivalent reductions in body weight. We also examined the relationship between changes in pericardial fat and changes in maximal oxygen consumption (V˙O2max), a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. METHODS: Thirty-two abdominally obese postmenopausal women (mean age=58 yr; 78% Caucasian) were randomly assigned to one of three interventions of equal energy deficit (∼2800 kcal·wk) for 20 wk: CR only (n=8), CR + moderate-intensity exercise (n=15), or CR + vigorous-intensity exercise (n=9). The volume of pericardial fat around the coronary arteries was measured by computed tomography. RESULTS:Women in the CR, CR + moderate-intensity, and CR + vigorous-intensity groups had similar baseline characteristics. The mean ± SD value for pericardial fat before weight loss was 79.07 ± 32.90 cm (range=34.04-152.74 cm), with no difference among groups (P=0.89). All three interventions significantly reduced body weight (15%), waist circumference (10%), and abdominal visceral fat (28%) to a similar degree. There was also a 17% reduction in pericardial fat (-12.75 ± 6.29 cm, P<0.0001), which did not differ among groups (P=0.84). Changes in pericardial fat were inversely correlated with changes in V˙O2max (r=-0.37, P=0.05), but not after adjusting for intervention group and change in body weight. CONCLUSIONS:Weight loss interventions of equal energy deficit have similar effects on pericardial fat in postmenopausal women, regardless of whether the energy deficit is due to CR alone or CR plus aerobic exercise.
Authors: Leanne M Redman; Leonie K Heilbronn; Corby K Martin; Anthony Alfonso; Steven R Smith; Eric Ravussin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Howard J Willens; Patricia Byers; Julio A Chirinos; Eugenio Labrador; Joshua M Hare; Eduardo de Marchena Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Guido A Rosito; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Frederick L Ruberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Kelly J Shields; Imke Janssen; Carrie Hanley; Matthew J Budoff; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Paul Poirier; Lora E Burke; Jean-Pierre Després; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Carl J Lavie; Scott A Lear; Chiadi E Ndumele; Ian J Neeland; Prashanthan Sanders; Marie-Pierre St-Onge Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Duke Appiah; Cora E Lewis; David R Jacobs; James M Shikany; Charles P Quesenberry; Myron Gross; Jeff Carr; Stephen Sidney; Erica P Gunderson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M Snel; J T Jonker; J Schoones; H Lamb; A de Roos; H Pijl; J W A Smit; A E Meinders; I M Jazet Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.257
Authors: Takashi Abe; Jun Seob Song; Zachary W Bell; Vickie Wong; Robert W Spitz; Yujiro Yamada; Jeremy P Loenneke Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Kelly J Shields; Imke Janssen; Matthew J Budoff; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Odessa Addison; Iva Miljkovic; Bret H Goodpaster; Bryan C Bergman; Richard V Clark; Joanne W Elena; Karyn A Esser; Luigi Ferrucci; Michael O Harris-Love; Steve B Kritchevsky; Amanda Lorbergs; John A Shepherd; Gerald I Shulman; Clifford J Rosen Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.566