Literature DB >> 2088186

Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in serum and suction blister fluid during continuous and intermittent infusions in healthy volunteers.

J W Mouton1, A M Horrevorts, P G Mulder, E P Prens, M F Michel.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime were investigated during intermittent (II) and continuous (CI) infusion in eight healthy male volunteers in a crossover fashion. The total daily dose was 75 mg/kg of body weight per 24 h in both regimens, given in three doses of 25 mg/kg/8 h (II) or 60 mg/kg/24 h with 15 mg/kg as a loading dose (CI). After the third dose (II) and during CI, serum and blister fluid samples were taken. Seven new blisters were raised for each timed sample by a suction blister technique. Blisters took 90 min to form. Samples were then taken from four blisters (A samples) and 1 h later were taken from the remaining three (B samples). The concentration of ceftazidime was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography method. After II, the concentrations in serum immediately after infusion (t = 30 min) and 8 h after the start of the infusion were 137.9 (standard deviation [SD], 27.5) and 4.0 (SD, 0.7) micrograms/ml, respectively. The half-life at alpha phase (t1/2 alpha) was 9.6 min (SD, 4.6), t1/2 beta was 94.8 min (SD, 5.4), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 285.4 micrograms.h/ml (SD, 22.7), total body clearance was 0.115 liter/h.kg (SD, 0.022), and volume of distribution at steady state was 0.178 liter/kg (SD, 0.023). The blister fluid (A) samples showed a decline in concentration parallel to that of the concentrations in serum during the elimination phase with a ratio of 1:1. The t1/2 of the A samples was 96.4 min (SD, 3.2). The concentration of ceftazidime in the B blister fluid samples was significantly higher (27%) than in the A samples over time. This shows that blisters may behave as a separate compartment and establishes the need to raise new blisters for each timed sample. The mean AUC/h during continuous infusion was 21.3 micrograms . h/ml (SD, 3.0). The total body clearance was 0.113 liter/h . kg (SD, 0.018), the urinary clearance was 0.105 liter/h . kg (SD, 0.012), and the ceftazidime/creatinine clearance ratio was 0.885. The mean AUC of blister fluid per hour was 84.5% (18.0 micrograms . h/liter; SD, 3.6) compared with that of serum. The A samples did not differ significantly from the B samples. The implications of continuous infusion of beta-lactams for treatment of serious infections are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2088186      PMCID: PMC172052          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.12.2307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  Clindamycin elimination in patients with liver disease.

Authors:  R H Eng; S Gorski; A Person; C Mangura; H Chmel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Simultaneous comparison of three methods for assessing ceftazidime penetration into extravascular fluid.

Authors:  D M Ryan; B Hodges; G R Spencer; S M Harding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M LeBel; G Barbeau; F Vallee; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Manual of symbols, equations & definitions in pharmacokinetics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Single dose of tinidazole in prophylaxis in infections following vaginal surgery.

Authors:  M Karhunen; O Koskela; K Hällström
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  The determination of lipids and proteins in suction blister fluid.

Authors:  B J Vermeer; F C Reman; C M van Gent
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  A randomized study of carbenicillin plus cefamandole or tobramycin in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.

Authors:  G P Bodey; S J Ketchel; V Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam.

Authors:  T B Tjandramaga; A Van Hecken; A Mullie; R Verbesselt; P J De Schepper; L Verbist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Impact of dosing intervals on activity of gentamicin and ticarcillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in granulocytopenic mice.

Authors:  A U Gerber; W A Craig; H P Brugger; C Feller; A P Vastola; J Brandel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Kinetics of antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  B Vogelman; W A Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  26 in total

1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of cefamandole and ceftazidime administered by continuous intravenous infusion.

Authors:  J Berkhout; L G Visser; P J van den Broek; J A M van de Klundert; H Mattie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  W A Craig; S C Ebert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in healthy volunteers--implications for optimal dosage regimens.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Martina Kinzig; Verena Jakob; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Fritz Sörgel; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Immunotherapy markedly increases the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy for treatment of Burkholderia pseudomallei infection.

Authors:  Katie L Propst; Ryan M Troyer; Lisa M Kellihan; Herbert P Schweizer; Steven W Dow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic considerations for antimicrobial therapy in patients receiving renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Federica Pavan; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Sofia K Kasiakou; Kenneth R Lawrence; Nicolaos Choulis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nieko Punt; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The renal clearance of cefuroxime and ceftazidime and the effect of probenecid on their tubular excretion.

Authors:  C A Verhagen; H Mattie; E Van Strijen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Continuous infusion of ceftazidime in febrile neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  S Daenen; Z Erjavec; D R Uges; H G De Vries-Hospers; P De Jonge; M R Halie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.