Literature DB >> 20881133

Phase misalignment between suprachiasmatic neuronal oscillators impairs photic behavioral phase shifts but not photic induction of gene expression.

Michael D Schwartz1, Seth Congdon, Horacio O de la Iglesia.   

Abstract

The ability of the circadian pacemaker within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) to respond to light stimulation in a phase-specific manner constitutes the basis for photic entrainment of circadian rhythms. The neural basis for this phase specificity is unclear. We asked whether a lack of synchrony between SCN neurons, as reflected in phase misalignment between dorsomedial (dmSCN) and ventrolateral (vlSCN) neuronal oscillators in the rat, would impact the ability of the pacemaker to respond to phase-resetting light pulses. Light pulses delivered at maximal phase misalignment between the vlSCN and dmSCN oscillators increased expression of Per1 mRNA, regardless of the circadian phase of the dmSCN. However, phase shifts of locomotor activity were only observed when the vlSCN and dmSCN were phase aligned at the time of stimulation. Our results fit a model in which a vlSCN oscillator phase gates its own response to light and in turn relays light information to a dmSCN oscillator. This model predicts that the phase misalignment that results from circadian internal desynchronization could preserve the ability of light to induce gene expression within the master circadian clock but impair its ability to induce behavioral phase shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881133      PMCID: PMC2976843          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1853-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  Topographic organization of suprachiasmatic nucleus projection neurons.

Authors:  R K Leak; R Y Moore
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Expression of Period genes: rhythmic and nonrhythmic compartments of the suprachiasmatic nucleus pacemaker.

Authors:  T Hamada; J LeSauter; J M Venuti; R Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Phase resetting light pulses induce Per1 and persistent spike activity in a subpopulation of biological clock neurons.

Authors:  Sandra J Kuhlman; Rae Silver; Joseph Le Sauter; Abel Bult-Ito; Douglas G McMahon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Coordination of circadian timing in mammals.

Authors:  Steven M Reppert; David R Weaver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Calbindin neurons in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus do not exhibit a circadian variation in spontaneous firing rate.

Authors:  Erin E Jobst; Charles N Allen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Per1 and Per2 gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: circadian profile and the compartment-specific response to light.

Authors:  L Yan; S Takekida; Y Shigeyoshi; H Okamura
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Suprachiasmatic nucleus in the mouse: retinal innervation, intrinsic organization and efferent projections.

Authors:  E E Abrahamson; R Y Moore
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Phase-dependent responses of Per1 and Per2 genes to a light-stimulus in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  S Miyake; Y Sumi; L Yan; S Takekida; T Fukuyama; Y Ishida; S Yamaguchi; K Yagita; H Okamura
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  W J Schwartz; A Carpino; H O de la Iglesia; R Baler; D C Klein; Y Nakabeppu; N Aronin
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Suprachiasmatic nucleus organization.

Authors:  Robert Y Moore; Joan C Speh; Rehana K Leak
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2002-06-08       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  10 in total

1.  Circadian desynchronization.

Authors:  Adrián E Granada; Trinitat Cambras; Antoni Díez-Noguera; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Neural correlates of individual differences in circadian behaviour.

Authors:  Jennifer A Evans; Tanya L Leise; Oscar Castanon-Cervantes; Alec J Davidson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Re-examining "temporal niche".

Authors:  Benjamin L Smarr; Michael D Schwartz; Cheryl Wotus; Horacio O de la Iglesia
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 4.  In synch but not in step: Circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms.

Authors:  J A Evans; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Na(V)1.1 channels are critical for intercellular communication in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and for normal circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Sung Han; Frank H Yu; Michael D Schwartz; Jonathan D Linton; Martha M Bosma; James B Hurley; William A Catterall; Horacio O de la Iglesia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Cell autonomy and synchrony of suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian oscillators.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mohawk; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Lhx1 controls terminal differentiation and circadian function of the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Joseph L Bedont; Tara A LeGates; Emily A Slat; Mardi S Byerly; Hong Wang; Jianfei Hu; Alan C Rupp; Jiang Qian; G William Wong; Erik D Herzog; Samer Hattar; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  KATP Channels Mediate Differential Metabolic Responses to Glucose Shortage of the Dorsomedial and Ventrolateral Oscillators in the Central Clock.

Authors:  Jyh-Jeen Yang; Ruo-Ciao Cheng; Pi-Cheng Cheng; Yi-Chi Wang; Rong-Chi Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Biological Clock in Gray Mouse Lemur: Adaptive, Evolutionary and Aging Considerations in an Emerging Non-human Primate Model.

Authors:  Clara Hozer; Fabien Pifferi; Fabienne Aujard; Martine Perret
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Differentiating external zeitgeber impact on peripheral circadian clock resetting.

Authors:  Isabel Heyde; Henrik Oster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.