Literature DB >> 10869847

Differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus.

W J Schwartz1, A Carpino, H O de la Iglesia, R Baler, D C Klein, Y Nakabeppu, N Aronin.   

Abstract

Extensive studies have established that light regulates c-fos gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the site of an endogenous circadian clock, but relatively little is known about the expression of genes structurally related to c-fos, including fra-1, fra-2 and fosB. We analysed the photic and temporal regulation of these genes at the messenger RNA and immunoreactive protein levels in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus, and we found different expression patterns after photic stimulation and depending on location in the ventrolateral or dorsomedial subdivisions. In the ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus, c-fos, fra-2 and fosB expression was stimulated after a subjective-night (but not subjective-day) light pulse. Expression of the fra-2 gene was prolonged following photic stimulation, with elevated messenger RNA and protein levels that appeared unchanged for at least a few hours beyond the c-fos peak. Unlike c-fos and fra-2, the fosB gene appeared to be expressed constitutively in the ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus throughout the circadian cycle; immunohistochemical analysis suggested that delta FosB was the protein product accounting for this constitutive expression, while FosB was induced by the subjective-night light pulse. In the dorsomedial suprachiasmatic nucleus, c-fos and fra-2 expression exhibited an endogenous circadian rhythm, with higher levels during the early subjective day, although the relative abundance was much lower than that measured after light pulses in the ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus. Double-label immunohistochemistry suggested that some of the dorsomedial cells responsible for the circadian expression of c-Fos also synthesized arginine vasopressin. No evidence of suprachiasmatic nucleus fra-1 expression was found. In summary, fos family genes exhibit differences in their specific expression patterns in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, including their photic and circadian regulation in separate cell populations in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions. The data, in combination with our previous results [Takeuchi J. et al. (1993) Neuron 11, 825-836], suggest that activator protein-1 binding sites on ventrolateral suprachiasmatic nucleus target genes are constitutively occupied by DeltaFosB/JunD complexes, and that c-Fos, Fra-2, FosB and JunB compete for binding after photic stimulation. The differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial suprachiasmatic nucleus suggests that their circadian function(s) and downstream target(s) are likely to be cell specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10869847     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00140-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  32 in total

1.  Dissociation between light-induced phase shift of the circadian rhythm and clock gene expression in mice lacking the pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide type 1 receptor.

Authors:  J Hannibal; F Jamen; H S Nielsen; L Journot; P Brabet; J Fahrenkrug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Expression of Period genes: rhythmic and nonrhythmic compartments of the suprachiasmatic nucleus pacemaker.

Authors:  T Hamada; J LeSauter; J M Venuti; R Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Heterogeneity of rhythmic suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: Implications for circadian waveform and photoperiodic encoding.

Authors:  Jeroen Schaap; Henk Albus; Henk Tjebbe VanderLeest; Paul H C Eilers; László Détári; Johanna H Meijer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Circadian phototransduction and the regulation of biological rhythms.

Authors:  Mario E Guido; Agata R Carpentieri; Eduardo Garbarino-Pico
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 5.  The circadian clock in the brain: a structural and functional comparison between mammals and insects.

Authors:  Charlotte Helfrich-Förster
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The suprachiasmatic nucleus is a functionally heterogeneous timekeeping organ.

Authors:  Rae Silver; William J Schwartz
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Expression of the c-Fos gene in the rat hypothalamus in electrical pain stimulation and UHF stimulation of the skin.

Authors:  N S Novikova; T B Kazakova; V Rogers; E A Korneva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05

8.  Gene profiling the response to repeated cocaine self-administration in dorsal striatum: a focus on circadian genes.

Authors:  Wendy J Lynch; Matthew J Girgenti; Florence J Breslin; Samuel S Newton; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Exploring spatiotemporal organization of SCN circuits.

Authors:  L Yan; I Karatsoreos; J Lesauter; D K Welsh; S Kay; D Foley; R Silver
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Basis of robustness and resilience in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: individual neurons form nodes in circuits that cycle daily.

Authors:  Matthew P Butler; Rae Silver
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.