BACKGROUND: Utilization of dried plasma for HIV-1 viral load testing would significantly decrease sample shipping costs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the precision and reproducibility of ViveST(®) (ST) as a transportation method for shipping specimens for HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty clinical plasma samples were used to generate replicate samples with HIV VL values of 4 log(10), 3 log(10) and 2 log(10) copies/mL for reproducibility testing and an additional 299 samples with HIV VL <50 copies/mL (99); 1.7 log(10) to 3.99 log(10) (100); and 4 log(10) to 5.99 log(10)/mL (100) were used to compare ViveST to frozen plasma samples using the VERSANT(®) HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay. Results were compared using Student t-test, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Mean intra-assay variance among frozen and dried plasma triplicates was 0.15 log(10) and 0.09 log(10) copies/mL respectively (n=10, P=NS). Compared to frozen plasma, there was a mean reduction of 0.3 log(10), 0.27 log(10), and 0.35 log(10) copies/mL at the 4 log(10), 3 log(10), and 2 log(10) copy/mL samples respectively (n=30, all comparisons, P<0.01). Overall correlation between 299 frozen and ViveST samples was r=0.97, where 12 of 99 undetectable frozen VL were positive with ST, and 12 of 200 frozen detectable VL were undetectable with ViveST (mean VL 2.1, 1.9 log(10) copies/mL respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1 viral load results using ViveST were reproducible, correlated well with frozen plasma, though yielding minimally lower values. Our data suggest that dried plasma for HIV-1 VL testing using ViveST has promise for use in HIV clinical practice. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Utilization of dried plasma for HIV-1 viral load testing would significantly decrease sample shipping costs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the precision and reproducibility of ViveST(®) (ST) as a transportation method for shipping specimens for HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty clinical plasma samples were used to generate replicate samples with HIV VL values of 4 log(10), 3 log(10) and 2 log(10) copies/mL for reproducibility testing and an additional 299 samples with HIV VL <50 copies/mL (99); 1.7 log(10) to 3.99 log(10) (100); and 4 log(10) to 5.99 log(10)/mL (100) were used to compare ViveST to frozen plasma samples using the VERSANT(®) HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay. Results were compared using Student t-test, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Mean intra-assay variance among frozen and dried plasma triplicates was 0.15 log(10) and 0.09 log(10) copies/mL respectively (n=10, P=NS). Compared to frozen plasma, there was a mean reduction of 0.3 log(10), 0.27 log(10), and 0.35 log(10) copies/mL at the 4 log(10), 3 log(10), and 2 log(10) copy/mL samples respectively (n=30, all comparisons, P<0.01). Overall correlation between 299 frozen and ViveST samples was r=0.97, where 12 of 99 undetectable frozen VL were positive with ST, and 12 of 200 frozen detectable VL were undetectable with ViveST (mean VL 2.1, 1.9 log(10) copies/mL respectively). CONCLUSIONS:HIV-1 viral load results using ViveST were reproducible, correlated well with frozen plasma, though yielding minimally lower values. Our data suggest that dried plasma for HIV-1 VL testing using ViveST has promise for use in HIV clinical practice. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Allison L Dauner; Theron C Gilliland; Indrani Mitra; Subhamoy Pal; Amy C Morrison; Robert D Hontz; Shuenn-Jue L Wu Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Kelli L Barr; Ali M Messenger; Benjamin D Anderson; John A Friary; Gary L Heil; Kristy Reece; Gregory C Gray Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 3.168