Literature DB >> 20880193

Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Rolf Gillitzer1, Carolin Thüroff1, Thomas Fandel1, Christian Thomas1, Joachim W Thüroff1, Walburgis Brenner1, Christoph Wiesner1, Jon Jones1, Torsten Hansen1, Christian Hampel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To determine the value of systematic intraoperative peripheral frozen sections (FS) with or without extended resection during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) compared with inked surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Between 1999 and 2003, in a prospective study, multiple peripheral FS (median 14; range 5-20) were taken from the urethral stump, circumferentially from the bladder neck, and from the lateral pedicles in 200 consecutive bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomies for clinically localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon. • Patients with stage pT3b or more and/or positive lymph nodes were excluded. • Of the 188 patients, 178 (94.7%) were followed over a median of 82 months (62-124). • BCR, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, was related to status of both, inked specimen margins and FS.
RESULTS: • Of all 188 prostatectomy specimens, 49 (26.1%) had positive surgical margins (PSM); these were found posterolaterally in 15 (30.6%), apically in 13 (26.5%), basally in 10 (20.4%) and at multiple sites in 11 (22.4%) specimens. • Intraoperative peripheral FS were positive in 19 (10.7%) patients, including 6.2% at urethral stump, 3.3% at lateral pedicles and 1.1% at bladder neck. • In organ-confined disease, BCR-free survival was 93.3% (111/119) for patients with negative surgical margins (NSM) and 72% (18/25) for patients with PSM (inked specimen), but negative peripheral FS (P < 0.001). • Five- and 10-year BCR-free survival for NSM was 94.9% and 92.8%, for PSM with negative peripheral FS it was 75.3% and 70.6%, and for PSM with positive peripheral FS it was 62.5% and 62.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: • Frozen section biopsies of peripheral resection margins during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy are not reliable in predicting PSM. • Intraoperative achievement of a locally disease-free status, as monitored by negative circumferential intraoperative FS of peripheral margins, is not associated with a statistically significant BCR-free survival benefit compared with patients with negative surgical margins on the prostatectomy specimen. • Based on these findings, we do not recommend a routine of systematically taking intraoperative FS biopsies during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880193     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09591.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparing histologic evaluation of prostate tissue using nonlinear microscopy and paraffin H&E: a pilot study.

Authors:  Lucas C Cahill; James G Fujimoto; Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Yubo Wu; Douglas I Lin; Huihui Ye; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Andrew A Wagner; Seymour Rosen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Intraoperative 68Ga-PSMA Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging for Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christopher Darr; Nina N Harke; Jan Philipp Radtke; Leubet Yirga; Claudia Kesch; Maarten R Grootendorst; Wolfgang P Fendler; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Christoph Rischpler; Christine Praus; Johannes Haubold; Henning Reis; Thomas Hager; Ken Herrmann; Ina Binse; Boris Hadaschik
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Chris Brew-Graves; Jack Grierson; Norman R Williams; Raj Persad; Neil Oakley; Jim M Adshead; Hartwig Huland; Alexander Haese; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Prostate specific membrane antigen-radio guided surgery using Cerenkov luminescence imaging-utilization of a short-pass filter to reduce technical pitfalls.

Authors:  Boris Alexander Hadaschik; Stephan Tschirdewahn; Christopher Darr; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Claudia Kesch; Ulrich Krafft; Lukas Püllen; Nina Natascha Harke; Jochen Hess; Tibor Szarvas; Johannes Haubold; Henning Reis; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ken Herrmann; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

6.  The efficacy and utilisation of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does it change the surgical dissection plan?

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Ömer Aytaç; Numan Cem Balcı; Haluk Kulaksızoğlu; Fatih Atuğ
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.