INTRODUCTION: We describe the development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction (PROMIS(®) SexFS; National Institutes of Health) measures, version 1.0, for cancer populations. AIM: To develop a customizable self-report measure of sexual function and satisfaction as part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health PROMIS Network. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary working group followed a comprehensive protocol for developing psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures including qualitative (scale development) and quantitative (psychometric evaluation) development. We performed an extensive literature review, conducted 16 focus groups with cancer patients and multiple discussions with clinicians, and evaluated candidate items in cognitive testing with patients. We administered items to 819 cancer patients. Items were calibrated using item-response theory and evaluated for reliability and validity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PROMIS SexFS measures, version 1.0, include 81 items in 11 domains: Interest in Sexual Activity, Lubrication, Vaginal Discomfort, Erectile Function, Global Satisfaction with Sex Life, Orgasm, Anal Discomfort, Therapeutic Aids, Sexual Activities, Interfering Factors, and Screener Questions. RESULTS: In addition to content validity (patients indicate that items cover important aspects of their experiences) and face validity (patients indicate that items measure sexual function and satisfaction), the measure shows evidence for discriminant validity (domains discriminate between groups expected to be different) and convergent validity (strong correlations between scores on PROMIS and scores on conceptually similar older measures of sexual function), as well as favorable test-retest reliability among people not expected to change (interclass correlations from two administrations of the instrument, 1 month apart). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS SexFS offers researchers a reliable and valid set of tools to measure self-reported sexual function and satisfaction among diverse men and women. The measures are customizable; researchers can select the relevant domains and items comprising those domains for their study.
INTRODUCTION: We describe the development and validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(®) Sexual Function and Satisfaction (PROMIS(®) SexFS; National Institutes of Health) measures, version 1.0, for cancer populations. AIM: To develop a customizable self-report measure of sexual function and satisfaction as part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health PROMIS Network. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary working group followed a comprehensive protocol for developing psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measures including qualitative (scale development) and quantitative (psychometric evaluation) development. We performed an extensive literature review, conducted 16 focus groups with cancerpatients and multiple discussions with clinicians, and evaluated candidate items in cognitive testing with patients. We administered items to 819 cancerpatients. Items were calibrated using item-response theory and evaluated for reliability and validity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PROMIS SexFS measures, version 1.0, include 81 items in 11 domains: Interest in Sexual Activity, Lubrication, Vaginal Discomfort, Erectile Function, Global Satisfaction with Sex Life, Orgasm, Anal Discomfort, Therapeutic Aids, Sexual Activities, Interfering Factors, and Screener Questions. RESULTS: In addition to content validity (patients indicate that items cover important aspects of their experiences) and face validity (patients indicate that items measure sexual function and satisfaction), the measure shows evidence for discriminant validity (domains discriminate between groups expected to be different) and convergent validity (strong correlations between scores on PROMIS and scores on conceptually similar older measures of sexual function), as well as favorable test-retest reliability among people not expected to change (interclass correlations from two administrations of the instrument, 1 month apart). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS SexFS offers researchers a reliable and valid set of tools to measure self-reported sexual function and satisfaction among diverse men and women. The measures are customizable; researchers can select the relevant domains and items comprising those domains for their study.
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Mian Wang; Kevin Weinfurt; Kathryn E Flynn; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Diana D Jeffery; Lisa Barbera; Barbara L Andersen; Amy K Siston; Anuja Jhingran; Shirley R Baron; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Deborah J Coady; Jeanne Carter; Kathryn E Flynn Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2015
Authors: Lena Wettergren; Erin E Kent; Sandra A Mitchell; Brad Zebrack; Charles F Lynch; Mara B Rubenstein; Theresa H M Keegan; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Helen M Parsons; Ashley Wilder Smith Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kathryn E Flynn; Jeanne Carter; Li Lin; Stacy T Lindau; Diana D Jeffery; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Bethanee J Schlosser; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Suzanne N Landi; Kemi M Doll; Jeannette T Bensen; Laura Hendrix; Carey K Anders; Jennifer M Wu; Hazel B Nichols Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Randal S Olshefski; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Vicky Lehmann Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: John Y Shin; Sani H Kizilbash; Steven I Robinson; Joon H Uhm; Julie E Hammack; Daniel H Lachance; Jan C Buckner; Aminah Jatoi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 4.130