Literature DB >> 20878414

Personality factors and mental health outcome in caregivers of first hospitalized schizophrenic and depressed patients: 2-year follow-up results.

Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler1, Felix Mädger.   

Abstract

While neuroticism has been intensely investigated in caregivers of patients with serious somatic disorders, studies in caregivers of patients with mental illness are lacking. Additionally, most studies are cross-sectional not allowing conclusions about long-term effects of personality factors. The present study examines the impact of personality factors on the course of subjective burden and psychological well-being by a mediational model in a sample of caregivers of first hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or depression within a 2-year follow-up period. At baseline, 83 caregivers could be enrolled in the study, the drop-out rate was about 23% at 2-year follow-up. Personality factors were assessed by the German version of the NEO-FFI (Borstenau and Costa 1993) only at baseline. At each follow-up, subjective burden was assessed by the FBQ (Möller-Leimkühler acc. to Pai and Kapur (Brit J Psychiat 138:332-335, 1981)), and psychological well-being by the SCL-90 R (Derogatis in SCL-90-R, administration, scoring and procedures. Manual for the r(evised) version. John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 1977). Among the personality factors, neuroticism turned out to be the most relevant predictor of subjective burden and self-rated symptoms, showing direct as well as indirect effects. The direct effects on caregivers' mental health were mediated to a considerable amount by subjective burden. The mediational model was stable across time and even revealed increasing indirect effects of neuroticism. Caregivers' neuroticism as a dispositional trait plays a crucial role in the course of the stress process. As neuroticism is associated with perceptual distortion, the latter should be targeted by long-term family interventions in order to reduce subjective burden and enhance mental health of the caregivers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878414     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-010-0155-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  31 in total

1.  Relatives' locus of control and expressed emotion in schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Authors:  H Bentsen; O G Munkvold; T H Notland; B Boye; A B Lersbryggen; K H Oskarsson; G Uren; I Ulstein; H Bjørge; R Berg-Larsen; O Lingjaerde; U F Malt
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-11

2.  Family burden and coping strategies in schizophrenia: 1-year follow-up data from the BIOMED I study.

Authors:  L Magliano; G Fadden; M Economou; T Held; M Xavier; M Guarneri; C Malangone; C Marasco; M Maj
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Multivariate prediction of relatives' stress outcome one year after first hospitalization of schizophrenic and depressed patients.

Authors:  Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 4.  A review of expressed emotion research in health care.

Authors:  A J Wearden; N Tarrier; C Barrowclough; T R Zastowny; A A Rahill
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-08

5.  Mental and physical health of spouse caregivers: the role of personality.

Authors:  K Hooker; D Monahan; K Shifren; C Hutchinson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-09

Review 6.  The predictive utility of expressed emotion in schizophrenia: an aggregate analysis.

Authors:  P Bebbington; L Kuipers
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Determinants of burden in those who care for someone with dementia.

Authors:  P Campbell; J Wright; J Oyebode; D Job; P Crome; P Bentham; L Jones; C Lendon
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.485

8.  Expressed emotion and psychiatric relapse: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R L Butzlaff; J M Hooley
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-06

9.  Links between expressed emotion and burden of care in relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Scazufca; E Kuipers
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Burden of relatives and predictors of burden. Baseline results from the Munich 5-year-follow-up study on relatives of first hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or depression.

Authors:  Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 5.270

View more
  5 in total

1.  Expressed and perceived emotion over time: does the patients' view matter for the caregivers' burden?

Authors:  Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler; Mitja Jandl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Mental Health Impact of Hosting Disaster Refugees: Analyses from a Random Sample Survey Among Haitians Living in Miami.

Authors:  Antoine Messiah; Jérôme Lacoste; Erick Gokalsing; James M Shultz; Pura Rodríguez de la Vega; Grettel Castro; Juan M Acuna
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 3.  Impact of patients' psychiatric hospitalization on caregivers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bridget E Weller; Madelaine Faulkner; Otima Doyle; Stephanie S Daniel; David B Goldston
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Caregiver burden in chronic mental illness: the role of patient and caregiver characteristics.

Authors:  Anne Maria Möller-Leimkühler; Andreas Wiesheu
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  A short-term, comprehensive, yoga-based lifestyle intervention is efficacious in reducing anxiety, improving subjective well-being and personality.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Yadav; Dipti Magan; Manju Mehta; Nalin Mehta; Sushil Chandra Mahapatra
Journal:  Int J Yoga       Date:  2012-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.