Literature DB >> 20878059

Prediction of the response to chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer by gene expression profiling of biopsy samples.

Masaaki Motoori1, Ichiro Takemasa, Makoto Yamasaki, Takamichi Komori, Atsushi Takeno, Hiroshi Miyata, Shuji Takiguchi, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Takushi Yasuda, Masahiko Yano, Nariaki Matsuura, Kenichi Matsubara, Morito Monden, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki.   

Abstract

To improve the prognosis of advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery is a promising treatment strategy. NACT has been shown to improve the prognosis of responders. However, non-responders not only suffer from side-effects, but they also lose precious time to take advantage of other possible treatments. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a reliable method that allows prediction of response before chemotherapy. A biopsy sample can provide valuable information on the biological characteristics of an individual esophageal cancer, which can affect chemosensitivity. Comprehensive gene expression profiling (GEP) using oligonucleotide microarray covering 30,000 human probes was performed in 50 pretreatment endoscopic biopsy samples from 25 patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who underwent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (two samples per patient). Chemotherapeutic responses were evaluated by the reduction rate of the tumor area on CT scans. Responders were defined as patients with reduction rates of ≥50% and non-responders were defined as patients with <50% decrease. The diagnostic system, that predicts responses to chemotherapy, was constructed with the 199 most informative genes, and showed 82% of accuracy. Furthermore, the predictive performance of this system was confirmed using an additional ten samples with an accuracy of 80%. This study shows that GEP of pretreatment ESCC biopsy samples has the potential to predict responses to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878059     DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  19 in total

1.  Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 suppresses squamous carcinogenic progression in a mouse model of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shaoxiang Wang; Zhan Du; Jie Luo; Xiao Wang; Haiying Li; Yuting Liu; Yong Zhang; Jiwei Ma; Weiwei Xiao; Yifei Wang; Xueyun Zhong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Pre-therapy mRNA expression of TNF is associated with regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with esophageal cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  J M Bowen; I White; L Smith; A Tsykin; K Kristaly; S K Thompson; C S Karapetis; H Tan; P A Game; T Irvine; D J Hussey; D I Watson; D M K Keefe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Norihisa Uemura; Tadashi Kondo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  New classification for the thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Makoto Yamasaki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A Transcriptomic Liquid Biopsy Assay for Predicting Resistance to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Keisuke Okuno; Masanori Tokunaga; Yusuke Kinugasa; Hideo Baba; Yasuhiro Kodera; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 13.787

6.  Early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer evaluated by computed tomography predicts the utility of a second cycle of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Takushi Yasuda; Hiroshi Miyata; Yingfeng Peng; Makoto Yamasaki; Osamu Shiraishi; Koji Tanaka; Osamu Ishikawa; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11

7.  Dysphagia predict the response to second cycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy in first cycle no response esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Yin Li; Jianjun Qin; Wenqun Xing; Xianben Liu; Haibo Sun; Xiankai Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  A head and neck cancer tumor response-specific gene signature for cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy fails with added taxanes.

Authors:  Céline Tomkiewicz; Stéphane Hans; Marie Hélène Mucchielli; Nicolas Agier; Hervé Delacroix; Laetitia Marisa; Daniel Brasnu; Lawrence P Aggerbeck; Cécile Badoual; Robert Barouki; Martine Aggerbeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  5-Fluorouracil induced intestinal mucositis via nuclear factor-κB activation by transcriptomic analysis and in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Chung-Ta Chang; Tin-Yun Ho; Ho Lin; Ji-An Liang; Hui-Chi Huang; Chia-Cheng Li; Hsin-Yi Lo; Shih-Lu Wu; Yi-Fang Huang; Chien-Yun Hsiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Small proline-rich repeat protein 3 enhances the sensitivity of esophageal cancer cells in response to DNA damage-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Aiping Luo; Hongyan Chen; Fang Ding; Yu Zhang; Mingrong Wang; Zefen Xiao; Zhihua Liu
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 7.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.