Literature DB >> 35703443

A Transcriptomic Liquid Biopsy Assay for Predicting Resistance to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Keisuke Okuno1,2, Masanori Tokunaga2, Yusuke Kinugasa2, Hideo Baba3, Yasuhiro Kodera4, Ajay Goel1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish a liquid-biopsy assay to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pretreatment prediction of resistance to NAT is of great significance for the selection of treatment options in ESCC patients. In this study, we comprehensively translated tissue-based microRNA (miRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression biomarkers into a liquid biopsy assay.
METHODS: We analyzed 186 clinical ESCC samples, which included 128 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and a matched subset of 58 serum samples, from 2 independent institutions. We performed quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and developed a resistance-prediction model using the logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: We first evaluated the potential of 4-miRNAs and 3-mRNAs panel, which robustly predicted resistance to NAT [area under the curve (AUC): 0.85]. Moreover, addition of tumor size to this panel increased predictive potential to establish a combination signature (AUC: 0.92). We successfully validated this signature performance in independent cohort, and our model was more accurate when the signature was combined with clinical predictors (AUC: 0.81) to establish a NAT resistance risk (NATRR) model. Finally, we successfully translated our NATRR model into a liquid biopsy assay (AUC: 0.78), and a multivariate regression analysis revealed this model as an independent predictor for response to NAT (odds ratio: 6.10; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a liquid biopsy-based assay that allows robust prediction of response to NAT in ESCC patients, and our assay provides fundamentals of developing precision-medicine.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35703443      PMCID: PMC9276630          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  49 in total

1.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.

Authors:  Soichi Odawara; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takayuki Katsuura; Yasunori Kurahashi; Hisashi Shinohara; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Exosomal microRNA Biomarkers: Emerging Frontiers in Colorectal and Other Human Cancers.

Authors:  Oscar A Tovar-Camargo; Shusuke Toden; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  The predictive value of genes of the TGF-beta1 pathway in multimodally treated squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Franziska Pühringer-Oppermann; Mario Sarbia; Nicola Ott; Björn L D M Brücher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.

Authors:  Y Kanda
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: The association with baseline variables and survival-The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Mariela Blum Murphy; Lianchum Xiao; Viren R Patel; Dipen M Maru; Arlene M Correa; Fatemeh G Amlashi; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Steven H Lin; Heath D Skinner; Ara Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Stephen G Swisher; Boris Sepesi; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A 17-molecule set as a predictor of complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hajime Fujishima; Shoichi Fumoto; Tomotaka Shibata; Kohei Nishiki; Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Masatsugu Moriyama; Norio Shiraishi; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Transcriptomic biomarkers for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Anita Lavery; Richard C Turkington
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2021-01-08

10.  Phase I/II trial of chemoradiotherapy with concurrent S-1 and cisplatin for clinical stage II/III esophageal carcinoma (JCOG 0604).

Authors:  Makoto Tahara; Nozomu Fuse; Junki Mizusawa; Akihiro Sato; Keiji Nihei; Keisuke Kanato; Ken Kato; Kentaro Yamazaki; Kei Muro; Hiromasa Takaishi; Narikazu Boku; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.