Literature DB >> 20877411

Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come.

R Ramanathan1.   

Abstract

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory morbidity in preterm infants. Surfactant therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation through the endotracheal tube (ETT) have been the cornerstones in RDS management. Despite improvements in the provision of mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a multifactorial disease in which invasive mechanical ventilation is a known contributory factor, remains an important cause of morbidity among preterm infants. Barotrauma, volutrauma or oxygen-induced lung inflammation (oxy-trauma) contributes significantly to the development of BPD in neonates ventilated through an ETT. Recently, nasal respiratory support has been increasingly used in preterm infants in an attempt to decrease post-extubation failure and, perhaps, BPD, and for the treatment of apnea of prematurity in nonventilated neonates. Observational studies using noninvasive respiratory support, such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), have shown a decrease in the incidence of BPD when used to avoid intubation or minimize the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation through the ETT. Moreover, synchronized as well as nonsynchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) have been shown to significantly decrease post-extubation failure compared with NCPAP and their use has been associated with a reduced risk of BPD in small randomized controlled clinical trials. More recently, early surfactant administration followed by extubation to NIPPV has been suggested to be synergistic in decreasing BPD. Although these findings are promising, additional studies evaluating different nasal interfaces, flow synchronization, synchronization using neurally adjusted ventilatory assist mode, and closed loop control of oxygen during nasal ventilation to minimize lung injury are needed in an attempt to further decrease the incidence of lung injury in preterm neonates requiring respiratory support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20877411     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  10 in total

1.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation efficacy and lung pressure transmission.

Authors:  A Mukerji; J Belik
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Comparison of Effort of Breathing for Infants on Nasal Modes of Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Asavari Kamerkar; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Non-invasive ventilation and surfactant treatment as the primary mode of respiratory support in surfactant-deficient newborn piglets.

Authors:  Carmen Rey-Santano; Victoria E Mielgo; Miguel Angel Gomez-Solaetxe; Francesca Ricci; Federico Bianco; Fabrizio Salomone; Begoña Loureiro; Jon López de Heredia Y Goya
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Predicting Failure of Non-Invasive Ventilation With RAM Cannula in Bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Mia Maamari; Gustavo Nino; James Bost; Yao Cheng; Anthony Sochet; Matthew Sharron
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.510

5.  High Flow Nasal Cannulae versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome Managed with INSURE Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maliheh Kadivar; Ziba Mosayebi; Nosrat Razi; Shahin Nariman; Razieh Sangsari
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11

6.  Use of Nasal Non-Invasive Ventilation with a RAM Cannula in the Outpatient Home Setting.

Authors:  Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas; Cheryl L Samuels; Traci R Gonzales; Katrina E McBeth; Aravind Yadav; James M Stark; Cindy Jon; Ricardo A Mosquera
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Comparative bench study evaluation of different infant interfaces for non-invasive ventilation.

Authors:  Giorgio Conti; Giorgia Spinazzola; Cesare Gregoretti; Giuliano Ferrone; Andrea Cortegiani; Olimpia Festa; Marco Piastra; Luca Tortorolo; Roberta Costa
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.317

8.  High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Children with Respiratory Distress.

Authors:  Punthila Sitthikarnkha; Rujipat Samransamruajkit; Nuanchan Prapphal; Jitladda Deerojanawong; Suchada Sritippayawan
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-05

9.  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure inhibits gastroesophageal reflux in newborn lambs.

Authors:  Djamal Djeddi; Danny Cantin; Nathalie Samson; Jean-Paul Praud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  RAM cannula with Cannulaide versus Hudson prongs for delivery of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: an RCT.

Authors:  Shravani Maram; Srinivas Murki; Sidharth Nayyar; Sandeep Kadam; Tejo Pratap Oleti; Rajendra Prasad Anne; Saikiran Deshobhotla; Deepak Sharma; Subhash Arun; Praveen Rao Vadije
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.