Literature DB >> 33412988

Predicting Failure of Non-Invasive Ventilation With RAM Cannula in Bronchiolitis.

Mia Maamari1, Gustavo Nino2, James Bost3, Yao Cheng3, Anthony Sochet4, Matthew Sharron1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) via the RAM cannula nasal interface, variables predicting subsequent intubation, or NIV non-response, are understudied. We sought to identify predictors of NIV non-response.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in infants admitted for respiratory failure from bronchiolitis placed on NIV in a quaternary children's hospital. We excluded children with concurrent sepsis, critical congenital heart disease, or with preexisting tracheostomy. The primary outcome was NIV non-response defined as intubation after a trial of NIV. Secondary outcomes were vital sign values before and after NIV initiation, duration of NIV and intubation, and mortality. Primary analyses included Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, student's t test, paired analyses, and adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression assessing heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) before and after NIV initiation.
RESULTS: Of 138 infants studied, 34% were non-responders. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of responders and non-responders. HR decreased after NIV initiation in responders (156 [143-156] to149 [141-158], p < 0.01) compared to non-responders (158 [149-166] to 158 [145-171], p = 0.73). RR decreased in responders (50 [43-58] vs 47 [41-54]) and non-responders (52 [48-58] vs 51 [40-55], both p < 0.01). Concurrent bacterial pneumonia (OR 6.06, 95% CI: 2.54-14.51) and persistently elevated HR (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were associated with NIV non-response.
CONCLUSION: In children with acute bronchiolitis who fail to respond to NIV and require subsequent intubation, we noted associations with persistently elevated HR after NIV initiation and concurrent bacterial pneumonia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bronchiolitis; intubation; noninvasive ventilation; physiological variability; pneumonia; respiratory insufficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33412988      PMCID: PMC8886620          DOI: 10.1177/0885066620979642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  27 in total

1.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation efficacy and lung pressure transmission.

Authors:  A Mukerji; J Belik
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  The Clinical Impact of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Pediatric Respiratory Distress.

Authors:  Atsushi Kawaguchi; Yutaka Yasui; Allan deCaen; Daniel Garros
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Comparison of Effort of Breathing for Infants on Nasal Modes of Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Asavari Kamerkar; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Christopher J L Newth; Patrick A Ross; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery.

Authors:  A Schibler; T M T Pham; K R Dunster; K Foster; A Barlow; K Gibbons; J L Hough
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Non invasive positive pressure ventilation in infants with respiratory failure.

Authors:  Yuval Cavari; Shaul Sofer; Uri Rozovski; Isaac Lazar
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2012-04-13

6.  High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Pediatric Patients: A Survey of Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Andrew G Miller; Michael A Gentle; Lisa M Tyler; Natalie Napolitano
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.258

7.  PEEP Generated by High-Flow Nasal Cannula in a Pediatric Model.

Authors:  Beverly D Ejiofor; Ryan W Carroll; William Bortcosh; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 8.  Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Katherine L Fedor
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.258

9.  Non-invasive ventilation as primary ventilatory support for infants with severe bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Etienne Javouhey; Audrey Barats; Nathalie Richard; Didier Stamm; Daniel Floret
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Outcomes for Children Receiving Noninvasive Ventilation as the First-Line Mode of Mechanical Ventilation at Intensive Care Admission: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jenny V Morris; Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Roger C Parslow; Sarah J Fleming
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Retrospective Analysis of Feeding Practices and Complications in Patients with Critical Bronchiolitis on Non-Invasive Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Ariann Lenihan; Vannessa Ramos; Nichole Nemec; Joseph Lukowski; Junghyae Lee; K M Kendall; Sidharth Mahapatra
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.