Literature DB >> 20875937

Added value of 80 kVp images to averaged 120 kVp images in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas in liver transplantation candidates using dual-source dual-energy MDCT: results of JAFROC analysis.

Ji Hoon Park1, Se Hyung Kim, Hee Sun Park, Gi Hyeon Kim, Jae Young Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the added value of 80 kVp images to weighted average 120 kVp images for detecting hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) using dual-source, dual-energy MDCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one HCCs in 42 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) were included. All patients underwent quadruple-phase CT using a 64-row dual-source, dual-energy MDCT with 80 kVp and 140 kVp. For 120 kVp, a linear blending ratio of 0.3 was chosen. Interval reviews for both simulated 120 kVp images without and with pure 80 kVp data were performed independently by two radiologists. They detected HCCs using a 4-point confidence scale. Tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and compared between the 80 kVp and simulated 120 kVp images. The additional diagnostic value of 80 kVp images was evaluated by jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis.
RESULTS: There were 41 HCCs on pathology and 37 of the 41 HCCs were depicted on CT scan. The mean CNR of the 37 HCCs in late arterial and portal-phase images was significantly better in the 80 kVp images than in 120 kVp images. The average JAFROC figure of merit, however, was not significantly improved when 80 kVp was added. Furthermore, the number of false-positives was significantly increased in reader 1 when adding 80kVp data.
CONCLUSION: The addition of 80 kVp CT images to simulated 120 kVp images did not significantly improve the detection of HCCs despite of the significantly better CNR of 80 kVp images.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875937     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Modern CT and PET/CT imaging of the liver].

Authors:  J Klasen; T A Heusner; C Riegger; D Reichelt; J Kuhlemann; G Antoch; D Blondin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Volumetric low-tube-voltage CT imaging for evaluating hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma; effects on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Tomoaki Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Hiroyuki Morisaka; Katsuhiro Sano; Muhi Ali; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Recent Advances in CT and MR Imaging for Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Min Lee; Jeong-Hee Yoon; Ijin Joo; Hyun Sik Woo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.

Authors:  William P Shuman; Doug E Green; Janet M Busey; Orpheus Kolokythas; Lee M Mitsumori; Kent M Koprowicz; Jean-Baptiste Thibault; Jiang Hsieh; Adam M Alessio; Eunice Choi; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Tumor Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kang; Hyunchul Rhim
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 11.740

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.