Literature DB >> 20875490

Enhancement of the protective efficacy of a Chlamydia trachomatis recombinant vaccine by combining systemic and mucosal routes for immunization.

Pooja Ralli-Jain1, Delia Tifrea, Chunmei Cheng, Sukumar Pal, Luis M de la Maza.   

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis causes respiratory and sexually transmitted infections. Here, we tested a vaccine formulated with the recombinant major outer membrane protein from C. trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (CT-MoPn) for its ability to protect mice against an intranasal (i.n.) challenge. The adjuvants CpG and Montanide were used for systemic routes, intramuscular (i.m.) and subcutaneous (s.c.), and cholera toxin for mucosal routes, sublingual (s.l.) and colonic (c.l.). Mucosal immunizations were performed either alone or in combination with systemic routes. Mice inoculated i.n. with 10(4) inclusion-forming units (IFU) of CT-MoPn served as a positive control and the Neisseria gonorrhoeae recombinant porin B (Ng-rPorB) as the negative antigen control. Immunized animals were challenged i.n. with 10(4)IFU of CT-MoPn. Following immunization the combination groups showed high chlamydial serum IgG titers (s.l.+i.m.+s.c. 25,600; c.l+i.m.+s.c. 102,400) and the IgG2a/IgG1 ratios indicated a Th1 response. Following the i.n. challenge the s.l.+i.m.+s.c. group showed the best protection as demonstrated by an increase in body weight of 0.3% over the 10 day course of infection. A statistically significant difference was found when compared with the Ng-rPorB immunized animals that had lost 20% of their original body weight (P<0.05). In addition, the repeated measures ANOVA test showed significant difference in body weight change for the combined immunized groups vs their mucosal counterparts and also the systemic immunized group. A statistically significant difference (P<0.05) was also observed in the number of IFUs recovered from the lungs when the s.l.+i.m.+s.c. (2.8×10(6)) and c.l.+i.m.+s.c. (3.4×10(6)) groups were compared to their respective mucosal only groups (s.l.: 61.9×10(6) and c.l: 136.2×10(6)) and the control Ng-rPorB immunized mice (198.2×10(6)) (P<0.05). In conclusion, a combined systemic plus mucosal vaccination provides better protection against a respiratory challenge with C. trachomatis than either systemic or mucosal immunizations alone.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875490      PMCID: PMC2981640          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  54 in total

1.  Sublingual immunization induces broad-based systemic and mucosal immune responses in mice.

Authors:  Nicolas Cuburu; Mi-Na Kweon; Joo-Hye Song; Catherine Hervouet; Carmelo Luci; Jia-Bin Sun; Paul Hofman; Jan Holmgren; Fabienne Anjuère; Cecil Czerkinsky
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Immunization with the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis major outer membrane protein can elicit a protective immune response against a genital challenge.

Authors:  S Pal; I Theodor; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Prediction of pelvic inflammatory disease among young, single, sexually active women.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness; Kenneth J Smith; Chung-Chou H Chang; Enrique F Schisterman; Debra C Bass
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment strategies for women with pelvic inflammatory disease: results from the Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness; David E Soper; Robert L Holley; Jeffrey Peipert; Hugh Randall; Richard L Sweet; Steven J Sondheimer; Susan L Hendrix; Antonio Amortegui; Giuliana Trucco; Thomas Songer; Judith R Lave; Sharon L Hillier; Debra C Bass; Sheryl F Kelsey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  CpG DNA induces stronger immune responses with less toxicity than other adjuvants.

Authors:  R D Weeratna; M J McCluskie; Y Xu; H L Davis
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  The unexpected impact of a Chlamydia trachomatis infection control program on susceptibility to reinfection.

Authors:  Robert C Brunham; Babak Pourbohloul; Sunny Mak; Rick White; Michael L Rekart
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Two different homing pathways involving integrin β7 and E-selectin significantly influence trafficking of CD4 cells to the genital tract following Chlamydia muridarum infection.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kelly; Ann M Chan; Anthony Butch; Toni Darville
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Influenza vaccination.

Authors:  M A Riddiough; J E Sisk; J C Bell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results.

Authors:  L Weström; R Joesoef; G Reynolds; A Hagdu; S E Thompson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Towards an oral influenza vaccine: comparison between intragastric and intracolonic delivery of influenza subunit vaccine in a murine model.

Authors:  J-P Amorij; T A Westra; W L J Hinrichs; A Huckriede; H W Frijlink
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  17 in total

1.  A single sublingual dose of an adenovirus-based vaccine protects against lethal Ebola challenge in mice and guinea pigs.

Authors:  Jin Huk Choi; Stephen C Schafer; Lihong Zhang; Gary P Kobinger; Terry Juelich; Alexander N Freiberg; Maria A Croyle
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Protection against a chlamydial respiratory challenge by a chimeric vaccine formulated with the Chlamydia muridarum major outer membrane protein variable domains using the Neisseria lactamica porin B as a scaffold.

Authors:  Delia F Tifrea; Sukumar Pal; Jeff Fairman; Paola Massari; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 7.344

3.  Immunization of mice with chimeric antigens displaying selected epitopes confers protection against intestinal colonization and renal damage caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  David A Montero; Felipe Del Canto; Juan C Salazar; Sandra Céspedes; Leandro Cádiz; Mauricio Arenas-Salinas; José Reyes; Ángel Oñate; Roberto M Vidal
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 7.344

Review 4.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: understanding the roles of innate and adaptive immunity in vaccine research.

Authors:  Sam Vasilevsky; Gilbert Greub; Denise Nardelli-Haefliger; David Baud
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Update on Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccinology.

Authors:  Luis M de la Maza; Guangming Zhong; Robert C Brunham
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-04-05

6.  Increased immunoaccessibility of MOMP epitopes in a vaccine formulated with amphipols may account for the very robust protection elicited against a vaginal challenge with Chlamydia muridarum.

Authors:  Delia F Tifrea; Sukumar Pal; Jean-Luc Popot; Melanie J Cocco; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  Future of human Chlamydia vaccine: potential of self-adjuvanting biodegradable nanoparticles as safe vaccine delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Rajnish Sahu; Richa Verma; Saurabh Dixit; Joseph U Igietseme; Carolyn M Black; Skyla Duncan; Shree R Singh; Vida A Dennis
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.217

8.  Simultaneous Intramuscular And Intranasal Administration Of Chitosan Nanoparticles-Adjuvanted Chlamydia Vaccine Elicits Elevated Protective Responses In The Lung.

Authors:  Yumeng Li; Chuan Wang; Zhenjie Sun; Jian Xiao; Xiaoliang Yan; Yuqing Chen; Jian Yu; Yimou Wu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-10-08

Review 9.  Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine research through the years.

Authors:  Katelijn Schautteet; Evelien De Clercq; Daisy Vanrompay
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-26

Review 10.  Synthetic Nanoparticles for Vaccines and Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Darrell J Irvine; Melissa C Hanson; Kavya Rakhra; Talar Tokatlian
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.