Literature DB >> 18061315

Towards an oral influenza vaccine: comparison between intragastric and intracolonic delivery of influenza subunit vaccine in a murine model.

J-P Amorij1, T A Westra, W L J Hinrichs, A Huckriede, H W Frijlink.   

Abstract

In this paper we investigated to which part of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract, the upper or lower part, an oral influenza vaccine should be targeted to result in an effective immune response in mice. Our study demonstrates that without adjuvant substantial systemic but low respiratory mucosal immune responses were induced in mice after delivery of influenza subunit vaccine to the upper GI-tract (intragastric) as well as the lower GI-tract (intracolonically). When the vaccine was adjuvanted with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) these responses were significantly enhanced. Interestingly, intracolonic administration of vaccine with adjuvant also resulted in enhanced cellular immune responses and the desired Th1-skewing of these responses. Intragastric administration of the adjuvanted vaccine also increased T-helper responses. However, Th1-skewing was absent. In conclusion, the right combination of strong mucosal adjuvant (e.g. LT) and antigen delivery site (e.g. the lower part of the gastro-intestinal tract) might result in effective vaccination via the oral route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18061315     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  8 in total

1.  Enhancement of the protective efficacy of a Chlamydia trachomatis recombinant vaccine by combining systemic and mucosal routes for immunization.

Authors:  Pooja Ralli-Jain; Delia Tifrea; Chunmei Cheng; Sukumar Pal; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Induction of protection against vaginal shedding and infertility by a recombinant Chlamydia vaccine.

Authors:  Jennifer R Carmichael; Sukumar Pal; Delia Tifrea; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Non-invasive administration of biodegradable nano-carrier vaccines.

Authors:  Mohd Abul Kalam; Abdul Arif Khan; Aws Alshamsan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Oral vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine induces cross-protective immunity.

Authors:  Fu-Shi Quan; Richard W Compans; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Immunogenicity and protection of oral influenza vaccines formulated into microparticles.

Authors:  Prathap Nagaraja Shastri; Min-Chul Kim; Fu-Shi Quan; Martin J D'Souza; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Microneedle and mucosal delivery of influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sang-Moo Kang; Jae-Min Song; Yeu-Chun Kim
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.217

7.  Increased immunoaccessibility of MOMP epitopes in a vaccine formulated with amphipols may account for the very robust protection elicited against a vaginal challenge with Chlamydia muridarum.

Authors:  Delia F Tifrea; Sukumar Pal; Jean-Luc Popot; Melanie J Cocco; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Intranasal delivery of influenza subunit vaccine formulated with GEM particles as an adjuvant.

Authors:  Vinay Saluja; Jean P Amorij; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Kees Leenhouts; Anke Huckriede; Wouter L J Hinrichs; Henderik W Frijlink
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.