Literature DB >> 20874234

The PEACE project review of clinical instruments for hospice and palliative care.

Laura C Hanson1, Leslie P Scheunemann, Sheryl Zimmerman, Franziska S Rokoske, Anna P Schenck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospice and palliative care organizations are expanding their use of standardized instruments and other approaches to measure quality. We undertook a systematic review and evaluation of published patient-level instruments for potential application in hospice and palliative care clinical quality measurement.
METHODS: We searched prior reviews and computerized reference databases from 1990 through February 2007 for studies of instruments relevant to physical, psychological, social, cultural, spiritual, or ethical aspects of palliative care, or measuring prognosis, function or continuity of care. Publications were selected for full review if they provided evidence of psychometric properties or practical application of an instrument tested in or appropriate for a hospice or palliative care population. Selected instruments were evaluated and scored for scientific soundness and potential application in clinical quality measurement.
RESULTS: The search found 1427 publications, with 229 selected for full manuscript review. Manuscripts provided information on 129 instruments which were evaluated using a structured scoring guide for psychometric properties. Thirty-nine instruments scoring near or above the 75th percentile were recommended. Most instruments covered multiple domains or focused on care for physical symptoms, psychological or social aspects of care. Few instruments were available to measure cultural aspects of care, structure and process of care, and continuity of care.
CONCLUSION: Numerous patient-level instruments are available to measure physical, psychological and social aspects of palliative care with adequate evidence for scientific soundness and practical clinical use for quality improvement and research. Other aspects of palliative care may benefit from further instrument development research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20874234     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  9 in total

1.  Health care providers' use and knowledge of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): is there a need to improve information and training?

Authors:  Daniela Carli Buttenschoen; Jarad Stephan; Sharon Watanabe; Cheryl Nekolaichuk
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Research methods priorities in geriatric palliative medicine.

Authors:  Melissa D Aldridge Carlson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  The value of data collection within a palliative care program.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; David C Currow; Christine Ritchie; Janet Bull; Jane L Wheeler; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Outcome assessment instruments in palliative and hospice care--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Stephanie Stiel; T Pastrana; C Balzer; F Elsner; C Ostgathe; L Radbruch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Validation of the Quality of Dying-Hospice Scale.

Authors:  John G Cagle; Jean C Munn; Seokho Hong; Maggie Clifford; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Evaluating the quality of supportive oncology using patient-reported data.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Anne M Walling; Jennifer W Mack; Jennifer L Malin; Philip Pantoja; Karl A Lorenz; Diana M Tisnado
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking.

Authors:  David C Currow; Samuel Allingham; Patsy Yates; Claire Johnson; Katherine Clark; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Lauren Fisher; Larry Kushi; Chun R Chao; Brenda Vega; Gilda Rodrigues; Isabel Josephs; Katharine E Brock; Susan Buchanan; Mallory Casperson; Robert M Cooper; Karen M Fasciano; Tatjana Kolevska; Joshua R Lakin; Anna Lefebvre; Corey M Schwartz; Dov M Shalman; Catherine B Wall; Lori Wiener; Andrea Altschuler
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

9.  Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique.

Authors:  I Tuffrey-Wijne; M Wicki; P Heslop; M McCarron; S Todd; D Oliver; A de Veer; G Ahlström; S Schäper; G Hynes; J O'Farrell; J Adler; F Riese; L Curfs
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.