Literature DB >> 20873967

Biological variations in plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 may compromise their biomarker value in colorectal cancer.

Mads N Svendsen1, Nils Brünner, Ib J Christensen, Henriette Ytting, Camilla Bentsen, Anne F Lomholt, Hans J Nielsen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) plays a prominent role in tumor angiogenesis and plasma VEGF concentration may carry prognostic information in colorectal cancer. The VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1) is a regulatory receptor which is shredded into plasma of patients with colorectal cancer. For both molecules, large biological variation and lack of standardization of assay procedures are major challenges.
METHODS: We investigated pre-analytical, analytical, as well as short term and long term biological variation of plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 in volunteers. In addition, we evaluated plasma VEGF and VEGFR-1 as markers of colorectal disease in a case-control study on four groups of 77 individuals undergoing bowel endoscopy. Groups were categorized as 'no findings', 'non-malignant findings', 'adenoma', or 'colorectal cancer'.
RESULTS: In the studies on variation, temperature and delay before centrifugation significantly influenced plasma VEGF and, to a minor extent, plasma VEGFR-1 concentrations. In addition, we found large biological variations with CV up to 69.2% for VEGF and CV up to 35.9% for VEGFR-1. For both molecules the intra-subject variation exceeded the inter-subject variation. In the case control study neither plasma VEGF nor VEGFR-1 was able to differentiate between the four groups of individuals although plasma VEGFR-1 was significantly lower in patients with 'no findings'.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in plasma VEGF or VEGFR-1 between patients with no findings, benign disease, pre-malignant findings, and malignant findings after endoscopy. The poor discrimination between patients may be explained by the large inter- and intra-subject variations found for both molecules in volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873967     DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2010.521254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  4 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  Ulrika Sjöbom; Anders K Nilsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Technical considerations in the development of circulating peptides as pharmacodynamic biomarkers for angiogenesis inhibitors.

Authors:  Vasiliki Thomeas; Selina Chow; Jose O Gutierrez; Sanja Karovic; Kristen Wroblewski; Emily Kistner-Griffin; Theodore G Karrison; Michael L Maitland
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels in depression and following electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Karen M Ryan; Declan M McLoughlin
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Pre-Analytical Parameters Affecting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Measurement in Plasma: Identifying Confounders.

Authors:  Johanna M Walz; Daniel Boehringer; Heidrun L Deissler; Lothar Faerber; Jens C Goepfert; Peter Heiduschka; Susannah M Kleeberger; Alexa Klettner; Tim U Krohne; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Focke Ziemssen; Andreas Stahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.