Literature DB >> 20873935

The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.

Serge Caparos1, Karina J Linnell.   

Abstract

Selective attention has been hypothesized to reduce distractor interference at both perceptual and postperceptual levels (Lavie, 2005), respectively, by focusing perceptual resources on the attended location and by blocking at postperceptual levels distractors that survive perceptual selection. This study measured the impact of load on these selection mechanisms using a flanker paradigm (Eriksen & St. James, 1986) and indexing distractor interference as a function of separation. It distinguished changes in the extent of focus of the distractor-interference function of separation (reflecting perceptual selection) from changes in the amplitude of distractor interference not accompanied by changes in focus (reflecting postperceptual selection). It showed that: (1) the spatial profile of perceptual resources is shaped like a "Mexican hat" (Müller et al., 2005); (2) increasing perceptual load focuses perceptual resources (Caparos & Linnell, 2009); (3) increasing cognitive load defocuses perceptual resources; and (4) participants with reduced working-memory span show reduced postperceptual blocking of distractors. While these findings are consistent with two levels of selective attention, they show that the first perceptual level is affected not only by perceptual but also by cognitive-control mechanisms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873935     DOI: 10.1037/a0020367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Flexible attention system: Appearance time of split attention changes in accordance with the task difficulty level.

Authors:  Guangyao Zu; Hanbin Sang; Heng Zhou; Fan Zhang; Xiaogang Wu; Aijun Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Dynamics of auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-09-05

3.  Influence of motor planning on distance perception within the peripersonal space.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeremy T Nelson; Jaelle Scheuerman; Kristen B Venable; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Response terminated displays unload selective attention.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Domain-specific control of selective attention.

Authors:  Szu-Hung Lin; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

9.  Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.

Authors:  Lubna Ahmed; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceptual load and early selection: an effect of attentional engagement?

Authors:  Karina J Linnell; Serge Caparos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.