Literature DB >> 20873917

Evidence for proactive interference in the focus of attention of working memory.

Lauren M Carroll1, Annie Jalbert, Alexander M Penney, Ian Neath, Aimée M Surprenant, Gerald Tehan.   

Abstract

Proactive interference (PI) occurs when an earlier item interferes with memory for a newer item. Whereas some researchers (e.g., Surprenant & Neath, 2009a) argue that PI can be observed in all memory systems, some multiple systems theorists (e.g., Cowan, 1999) propose that items in the focus of attention of working memory are immune to PI. Two experiments tested whether PI occurs when the to-be-remembered items are assumed, by multiple-systems theorists, to be held in the focus of attention. In each experiment, subjects saw four trials in a row with the same type of to-be-remembered items, followed by four trials in a row with a different type of material. On each trial, only 3 stimuli were shown, which is below the capacity limit of the focus of attention, and subjects were asked if a probe item was one of those 3 items seen. In both experiments, response time increased from Trial 1 to Trial 4, suggesting that items from the earlier trials interfered with memory on the later trials. In addition, release from PI was shown in that response times decreased with a change of materials. The results replicate those first reported by Hanley and Scheirer (1975), and pose a problem for theorists who argue that parts of short-term memory are immune to PI. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873917     DOI: 10.1037/a0021011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  7 in total

1.  Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.

Authors:  Alicia Ralph; Jade N Walters; Alison Stevens; Kirra J Fitzgerald; Gerald Tehan; Aimee M Surprenant; Ian Neath; Josée Turcotte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

2.  When does a good working memory counteract proactive interference? Surprising evidence from a probe recognition task.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-03-19

3.  Cognitive control of familiarity: directed forgetting reduces proactive interference in working memory.

Authors:  Sara B Festini; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Changes to information in working memory depend on distinct removal operations.

Authors:  Hyojeong Kim; Harry R Smolker; Louisa L Smith; Marie T Banich; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The focus of attention is similar to other memory systems rather than uniquely different.

Authors:  Olivia Beaudry; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant; Gerald Tehan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  On the Use of Response Chunking as a Tool to Investigate Strategies.

Authors:  Christopher L Blume; Alexander P Boone; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.