Literature DB >> 20873908

Marital distress and mental health care service utilization.

Yael Chatav Schonbrun1, Mark A Whisman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the association between marital distress and mental health service utilization in a population-based sample of men and women (N = 1,601).
METHOD: The association between marital distress and mental health care service utilization was evaluated for overall mental health service utilization and for specific sectors of treatment providers, including psychiatrist, other mental health provider, other medical provider, and religious services provider. Interviews were used to assess past-year service utilization and presence of anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders.
RESULTS: Approximately 12% of married individuals sought help for problems with their emotions, nerves, or substance use during the 12 months preceding the interview. Marital distress was significantly associated with (a) overall mental health service utilization and service utilization provided by each of the sectors of providers when controlling for demographic variables and (b) overall mental health service utilization and receiving treatment from a psychiatrist when additionally controlling for past-year anxiety, mood, or substance use disorders. There was little evidence that the associations between marital distress and service utilization were moderated by gender or presence of psychiatric disorders.
CONCLUSION: The finding that marital distress is associated with greater mental health care service utilization suggests that clinicians should assess both individual and relationship factors among individuals presenting for treatment. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873908     DOI: 10.1037/a0019711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  6 in total

1.  "Go See Somebody": How Spouses Promote Mental Health Care.

Authors:  Corinne Reczek; Mieke Beth Thomeer; Lauren Gebhardt-Kram; Debra Umberson
Journal:  Soc Ment Health       Date:  2019-04-04

2.  Self-reporting DSM-5/ICD-11 clinically significant intimate partner violence and child abuse: Convergent and response process validity.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Jeffery D Snarr; Amy M Smith Slep; Katherine J W Baucom; David J Linkh
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2019-07-22

3.  Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention.

Authors:  McKenzie K Roddy; Caitlin A Stamatis; Karen Rothman; Brian D Doss
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Comprehensive determinants of health service utilisation for mental health reasons in a Canadian catchment area.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Fleury; Guy Grenier; Jean-Marie Bamvita; Michel Perreault; Yan Kestens; Jean Caron
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-04-02

5.  High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Katherine J W Baucom; Shu Xu; Amy M Smith Slep; Jeffery D Snarr; Heather M Foran; Michael F Lorber; Alexandra K Wojda; David J Linkh
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-07-16

6.  A case-controlled field study evaluating ICD-11 proposals for relational problems and intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Cary S Kogan; Heather M Foran; Samantha C Burns; Amy M Smith Slep; Alexandra K Wojda; Jared W Keeley; Tahilia J Rebello; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2018-04-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.