Literature DB >> 20872881

Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the skull base in the elderly: an international collaborative study.

Ian Ganly1, Snehal G Patel, Bhuvanesh Singh, Dennis H Kraus, Giulo Cantu, Dan M Fliss, Luiz P Kowalski, Carl Snyderman, Jatin P Shah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study by the International Collaborative Group, the authors examined a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions that had experience in craniofacial surgery with the objective of reporting outcomes and complications for craniofacial resection (CFR) in the elderly.
METHODS: One hundred seventy patients aged ≥70 years were included in the study. The median age was 75 years (range, 70-98 years). One hundred four patients (61%) had received previous single-modality or combined treatment, which included surgery in 79 patients (46%), radiation in 47 patients (28%), and chemotherapy in 13 patients (8%). The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (67 patients; 39%). The margins of resection were close or microscopically positive in 56 patients (33%). Sixty-eight patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (40%), and 3 patients received chemotherapy (2%). Complications were classified into overall, local, central nervous system (CNS), systemic, and orbital. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared with patients aged <70 years. Statistical analyses for outcomes were performed in relation to patient characteristics, tumor characteristics (including histology and extent of disease), surgical resection margins, previous radiation, and previous chemotherapy to determine predictive factors.
RESULTS: Postoperative mortality occurred in 16 patients (9%), and postoperative complications occurred in 72 patients (42%). Local wound complications occurred in 40 patients (24%), CNS complications occurred in 24 patients (14%), systemic complications occurred in 19 patients (11%), and orbital complications occurred in 4 patients (2%). Postoperative mortality and complications were significantly more frequent in elderly patients compared with patients aged <70 years (postoperative mortality: 9% vs 3%; P = .04; complications: 42% vs 32%; P = .0009). The 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rates were significantly poorer than those for patients aged <70 years (OS: 42% vs 56%; P < .0001; DSS: 53% vs 61%; P = .04; RFS: 46% vs 54%; P = .03). Surgical margin status and primary tumor histology were independent predictors of OS, DSS, and RFS in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: CFR for malignant skull base tumors in elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) was associated with increased mortality, complications, and poorer outcomes compared with patients aged <70 years.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872881     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes of Craniofacial Open Surgery in Octogenarians.

Authors:  Barak Ringel; Narin N Carmel-Neiderman; Daniel Ben-Ner; Aviyah Pery; Ahmad Safadi; Avraham Abergel; Nevo Margalit; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-03-09

2.  A new concept for classifying skull base defects for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yano; Mutsumi Okazaki; Kentarou Tanaka; Hideo Iida; Masaru Aoyagi; Atsunobu Tsunoda; Seiji Kishimoto
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base.

Authors:  Colin G Leonard; Vikram Padhye; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Outcomes of Open vs Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery in Patients 70 Years or Older.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Stephenson; Saangyoung Eric Lee; Katherine Adams; Douglas R Farquhar; Zainab Farzal; Charles S Ebert; Matthew Ewend; Deanna Sasaki-Adams; Brian D Thorp; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Sinonasal malignancies and charged particle radiation treatment: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marco Cianchetti; Maurizio Amichetti
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-27

6.  Association between modified frailty index and surgical outcomes in intradural skull base surgery.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Arash Abiri; Brandon M Lehrich; Mehdi Abouzari; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.116

7.  Predictors of surgical complications in patients with sinonasal malignancy.

Authors:  Sonam Dodhia; Conall W R Fitzgerald; Andrew T McLean; Avery Yuan; Cristina Valero Mayor; Dauren Adilbay; Ximena Mimica; Piyush Gupta; Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Snehal Patel; Richard J Wong; Jatin Shah; Ian Ganly; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 8.  Endoscopic endonasal technique: treatment of paranasal and anterior skull base malignancies.

Authors:  Pornthep Kasemsiri; Daniel Monte Serrat Prevedello; Bradley Alan Otto; Matthew Old; Leo Ditzel Filho; Amin Bardai Kassam; Ricardo Luis Carrau
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.