Literature DB >> 20872831

Miniaturized flow cytometry-based CHO-K1 micronucleus assay discriminates aneugenic and clastogenic modes of action.

Steven M Bryce1, Svetlana L Avlasevich, Jeffrey C Bemis, Stephen D Dertinger.   

Abstract

A well recognized advantage of the in vitro micronucleus assay is its ability to detect both aneugens and clastogens. This laboratory has previously described a flow cytometric approach for scoring in vitro micronuclei (MN)(Avlasevich et al. [2006]: Environ Mol Mutagen 47: 56–66). More recently, based on work with Chinese hamster cells, evidence has accumulated that the multiparametric data acquired by the flow cytometric process is capable of discriminating between aneugenic and clastogenic modes of action (MOA). That is, in the case of CHO-K1 cells, clastogens are observed to induce MN with minimal effects on the incidence of hypodiploid nuclei or the median size of MN (i.e., fluorescence intensity), whereas aneugens are observed to affect all three parameters. To systematically test whether these ‘‘signatures’’ are indeed reliable indicators of genotoxic MOA, CHO-K1 cells were treated with eight prototypical clastogens, eight an eugens, and 15 nongenotoxicants. Exposure was continuous (18–24 hrs) with harvest occurring immediately thereafter. Treatment and all subsequent processing and analysis steps occurred in the same 96-well plate, making this an efficient, miniaturized assay. The resulting flow cytometric MN data correlated well with expected in vitro cytogenetics: sensitivity 5 16/16, specificity 5 14/15. In addition, MOA signatures were identified that classified each of the 16 genotoxicants correctly as clastogenic or aneugenic. Taken together, these data indicate that flow cytometry represents an analytical platform that is capable of rapidly and objectively acquiring MN counts while simultaneously providing information on genotoxic MOA. Published 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872831     DOI: 10.1002/em.20618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  8 in total

1.  DEK over-expression promotes mitotic defects and micronucleus formation.

Authors:  Marie C Matrka; Robert F Hennigan; Ferdinand Kappes; Monica L DeLay; Paul F Lambert; Bruce J Aronow; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Genotoxicity of styrene-acrylonitrile trimer in brain, liver, and blood cells of weanling F344 rats.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hobbs; Rajendra S Chhabra; Leslie Recio; Michael Streicker; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 4.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Comprehensive interpretation of in vitro micronucleus test results for 292 chemicals: from hazard identification to risk assessment application.

Authors:  Byron Kuo; Marc A Beal; John W Wills; Paul A White; Francesco Marchetti; Andy Nong; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Keith Houck; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.168

6.  An Automated, Single Cell Quantitative Imaging Microscopy Approach to Assess Micronucleus Formation, Genotoxicity and Chromosome Instability.

Authors:  Chloe C Lepage; Laura L Thompson; Bradley Larson; Kirk J McManus
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  An in vitro-based hazard assessment of liquid smoke food flavourings.

Authors:  Erica Selin; Geeta Mandava; Alexandra-Livia Vilcu; Agneta Oskarsson; Johan Lundqvist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.