| Literature DB >> 20871769 |
Kirti S Kulkarni1, S B Kasture, S A Mengi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive disorders such as amnesia, attention deficit and Alzheimer's disease are emerging nightmares in the field of medicine because no exact cure exists for them, as existing nootropic agents (piractam, tacrine, metrifonate) have several limitations. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of Prunus amygdalus (PA) nuts on cognitive functions, total cholesterol levels and cholinesterase (ChE) activity in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Prunus amygdalus; amnesia; scopolamine
Year: 2010 PMID: 20871769 PMCID: PMC2937319 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.66841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Effect of the paste of Prunus amygdalus on transfer latency (elevated plus maze paradigm) in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats
| Vehicle control | 95.17 ± 14.92 | 39.83 ± 5.89 | 55.33 ± 8.77 | 23.83 ± 04.13 |
| Scopolamine hydrobromide (1) | 143.67 ± 17.2 | 118.8 ± 11.03 | 128.33 ± 19.53 | 118.83 ± 26.13 |
| 65.17 ± 7.98 | 32.17 ± 7.71 | 40.16 ± 8.16 | 12.67 ± 2.5 | |
| 55.5 ± 4.75 | 17.33 ± 4.73 | 23.83 ± 3.69 | 10.17 ± 2.33 | |
| 30.5 ± 6.67 | 15.33 ± 3.05 | 16.83 ± 1.74 | 3.5 ± 0.34 | |
| Piracetam (120) + scopolamine (1) | 52.17 ± 9.85 | 26.67 ± 3.60 | 34.17 ± 5.21 | 7.33 ± 2.13 |
| Simvastatine (0.5) + scopolamine (1) | 113.17 ± 12.92 | 86.17 ± 13.5 | 82.67 ± 16.72 | 77.17 ± 5.78 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at n = 6; One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test;
P <0.05;
P <0.01 versus the control group (14 days);
P <0.01 versus control group (7 days);
P <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on day 7;
P <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on day 14
Effect of the paste of Prunus amygdalus on step-down latency (passive avoidance paradigm) in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats
| Vehicle control | 2.67 ± 0.67 | 1.83 ± 0.47 | 3.16 ± 0.79 | 2.16 ± 0.60 |
| Scopolamine hydrobromide (1) | 2.83 ± 0.47 | 1.17 ± 0.17 | 1.67 ± 0.49 | 1.83 ± 0.30 |
| 3.67 ± 1.41 | 3.00 ± 0.58 | 4.00 ± 0.85 | 6.00 ± 1.51 | |
| 2.00 ± 0.51 | 3.16 ± 0.87 | 4.17 ± 1.35 | 6.67 ± 2.35 | |
| 2.00 ± 0.68 | 3.33 ± 0.72 | 5.00 ± 1.49 | 5.67 ± 1.89 | |
| Piracetam (120) + scopolamine (1) | 2.5 ± 0.76 | 3.5 ± 0.72 | 5.83 ± 1.25 | 7.00 ± 2.13 |
| Simvastatine (0.5) + scopolamine (1) | 1.67 ± 0.43 | 1.83 ± 0.60 | 2.58 ± 0.40 | 2.83 ± 0.48 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at n = 6; One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test; *P <0.05 versus control group (7 days); aP <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on the 7th day; ††P <0.01 versus control group (14 days);
P <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on day 14th day
Effect of the paste of Prunus amygdalus on serum total cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose levels in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats
| Vehicle control | 67.04 ± 5.33 | 56.52 ± 5.61 | 82.21 ± 8.18 | 82.88 ± 12.51 | 90.32 ± 7.16 | 90.72 ± 4.14 |
| Scopolamine hydrobromide (1) | 76.88 ± 6.52 | 82.78 ± 5.78 | 112.71 ± 21.90 | 93.97 ± 13.24 | 71.76 ± 6.22 | 78.51 ± 3.23 |
| 62.78 ± 4.78 | 51.07 ± 1.93 | 77.79 ± 24.34 | 70.84 ± 13.27 | 86.07 ± 2.71 | 90.62 ± 4.34 | |
| 58.61 ± 5.76 | 52.21 ± 3.78 | 67.71 ± 4.34 | 63.21 ± 13.42 | 91.92 ± 9.13 | 99.96 ± 9.20 | |
| 57.05 ± 4.97 | 48.60 ± 2.14 | 70.63 ± 6.58 | 57.86 ± 10.69 | 92.93 ± 7.23 | 101.54 ± 8.58 | |
| Piracetam (120) + scopolamine (1) | 58.80 ± 4.78 | 45.13 ± 3.29 | 54.81 ± 4.20 | 50.37 ± 3.0 | 81.98 ± 9.53 | 85.69 ± 12.92 |
| Simvastatin (0.5) + scopolamine (1) | 58.62 ± 4.79 | 42.35 ± 2.25 | 52.38 ± 3.61 | 39.54 ± 3.24 | 71.85 ± 5.32 | 82.95 ± 8.56 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at n = 6; One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test; *P <0.05 versus control group (7 days); ††P <0.01 versus control group (14 days);
P <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on day 14th day; Simvastatin (0.5 mg/kg, p. o.) was used as the standard drug
P <0.01 compared to the scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-administered group on day 7th day;
Effect of the paste of Prunus amygdalus on the locomotor activity in scopolamine-induced amnesia in rats
| Vehicle control | 156.00 ± 16.40 | 161.00 ± 13.41 | 158.33 ± 13.79 | 174.33 ± 6.44 |
| Scopolamine hydrobromide (1) | 141.33 ± 11.00 | 149.67 ± 10.64 | 137.5 ± 12.30 | 158.00 ± 12.12 |
| 155.33 ± 17.72 | 133.33 ± 13.58 | 145.17 ± 11.41 | 145.00 ± 13.09 | |
| 163.83 ± 18.12 | 157.33 ± 17.76 | 160.50 ± 18.24 | 152.00 ± 9.94 | |
| 199.17 ± 28.03 | 167.50 ± 12.76 | 164.00 ± 22.20 | 160.50 ± 9.82 | |
| Piracetam (120) + scopolamine (1) | 165.33 ± 16.63 | 172.50 ± 22.57 | 177.50 ± 22.59 | 192.50 ± 22.38 |
| Simvastatine (0.5) + scopolamine (1) | 175.33 ± 11.63 | 175.83 ± 21.34 | 189.17 ± 18.14 | 168.33 ± 15.00 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM at n = 6; The differences in mean were not significant at P <0.05; One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test
Figure 1Estimation of the acetylcholinesterase activity in rat brain homogenate in scopolamine induced amnesia.