Literature DB >> 20870270

Economic evaluation of alternative wastewater treatment plant options for pulp and paper industry.

Nurdan Buyukkamaci1, Emre Koken.   

Abstract

Excessive water consumption in pulp and paper industry results in high amount of wastewater. Pollutant characteristics of the wastewater vary depending on the processes used in production and the quality of paper produced. However, in general, high organic material and suspended solid contents are considered as major pollutants of pulp and paper industry effluents. The major pollutant characteristics of pulp and paper industry effluents in Turkey were surveyed and means of major pollutant concentrations, which were grouped in three different pollution grades (low, moderate and high strength effluents), and flow rates within 3000 to 10,000m(3)/day range with 1000m(3)/day steps were used as design parameters. Ninety-six treatment plants were designed using twelve flow schemes which were combinations of physical treatment, chemical treatment, aerobic and anaerobic biological processes. Detailed comparative cost analysis which includes investment, operation, maintenance and rehabilitation costs was prepared to determine optimum treatment processes for each pollution grade. The most economic and technically optimal treatment processes were found as extended aeration activated sludge process for low strength effluents, extended aeration activated sludge process or UASB followed by an aeration basin for medium strength effluents, and UASB followed by an aeration basin or UASB followed by the conventional activated sludge process for high strength effluents.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20870270     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  1 in total

1.  Neighborhood component analysis for modeling papermaking wastewater treatment processes.

Authors:  Yuchen Zhang; Jie Yang; Mingzhi Huang; Hongbin Liu
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.210

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.